Amélie Bret
About
In The Last Decade
Amélie Bret
5 papers receiving 61 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Cognitive Neuroscience 31
- Social Psychology 19
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 19
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 17
- Clinical Psychology 13
Countries citing papers authored by Amélie Bret
This map shows the geographic impact of Amélie Bret's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amélie Bret with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amélie Bret more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amélie Bret
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amélie Bret. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amélie Bret. The network helps show where Amélie Bret may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amélie Bret
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amélie Bret. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amélie Bret based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amélie Bret. Amélie Bret is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 43 | |
| 7 | 11 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.