Amelia Gangemi
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Co-authors
- Francesco ManciniMarcel van den HoutP. N. Johnson‐LairdSacha Bourgeois‐GirondePalmira FaraciSilvana MiceliRaffaëlla MisuracaReuven Dar
- Topics
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (12 papers)Emotions and Moral Behavior (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalyNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
Amelia Gangemi
30 papers receiving 581 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Clinical Psychology 322
- Cognitive Neuroscience 243
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 241
- Social Psychology 183
- General Decision Sciences 73
Countries citing papers authored by Amelia Gangemi
This map shows the geographic impact of Amelia Gangemi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amelia Gangemi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amelia Gangemi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amelia Gangemi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amelia Gangemi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amelia Gangemi. The network helps show where Amelia Gangemi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amelia Gangemi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amelia Gangemi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amelia Gangemi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amelia Gangemi. Amelia Gangemi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 48 | |
| 8 | 58 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 48 | |
| 11 | Moral choices: The influence of the “Do not play God” principle | 6 |
| 12 | 49 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 36 | |
| 15 | 39 | |
| 16 | Trattamento cognitivo-comportamentale nel Disturbo Ossessivo-Compulsivo:risultati di uno studio di esito naturalistico in aperto con follow-up a 6,12 e 24 mesi | 3 |
| 17 | 76 | |
| 18 | 91 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Amelia Gangemi
Amelia Gangemi is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Arts and Humanities, having authored 35 papers that have together received 618 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (15 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (12 papers) and Emotions and Moral Behavior (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (73 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (241 citations) and Clinical Psychology (322 citations). Amelia Gangemi has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Mancini, Marcel van den Hout, P. N. Johnson‐Laird, Sacha Bourgeois‐Gironde, Palmira Faraci, Silvana Miceli, Raffaëlla Misuraca, Reuven Dar, Marleen M. Rijkeboer and Irene Klugkist. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Review, Behaviour Research and Therapy and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.