Amber M. Bates

71 total papers · 995 total citations
38 papers, 445 citations indexed

About

Amber M. Bates is a scholar working on Oncology, Immunology and Microbiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber M. Bates has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 445 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Oncology, 18 papers in Immunology and 10 papers in Microbiology. Recurrent topics in Amber M. Bates's work include Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (14 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (14 papers) and Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (10 papers). Amber M. Bates is often cited by papers focused on Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (14 papers), Immunotherapy and Immune Responses (14 papers) and Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities (10 papers). Amber M. Bates collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Amber M. Bates's co-authors include Kim A. Brogden, Carol L. Fischer, Stanley Perlman, Rudragouda Channappanavar, Jung-Eun Park, Thomas Bair, Christine Wohlford-Lenane, James T. Earnest, Tom Gallagher and David K. Meyerholz and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Cancer Research and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Amber M. Bates

37 papers receiving 437 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Amber M. Bates 135 134 127 79 42 38 445
Christopher Oelkrug 108 0.8× 55 0.4× 136 1.1× 151 1.9× 61 1.5× 23 458
Pablo Cerezuela 159 1.2× 80 0.6× 63 0.5× 76 1.0× 57 1.4× 31 469
Maja Ćupić 97 0.7× 153 1.1× 46 0.4× 50 0.6× 14 0.3× 36 451
Pradeep Sharma 68 0.5× 36 0.3× 120 0.9× 140 1.8× 43 1.0× 37 422
Mohammad M. Farajollahi 69 0.5× 41 0.3× 110 0.9× 232 2.9× 13 0.3× 44 495
Pujarini Dash 91 0.7× 34 0.3× 203 1.6× 122 1.5× 14 0.3× 28 444
Tahoora Mousavi 39 0.3× 90 0.7× 109 0.9× 65 0.8× 7 0.2× 48 399
Andrea Horváth 58 0.4× 117 0.9× 29 0.2× 116 1.5× 29 0.7× 40 458
Xinping Wang 56 0.4× 100 0.7× 32 0.3× 171 2.2× 14 0.3× 43 474
Atieh Yaghoubi 46 0.3× 127 0.9× 50 0.4× 170 2.2× 27 0.6× 33 479

Countries citing papers authored by Amber M. Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber M. Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber M. Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber M. Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber M. Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber M. Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber M. Bates. The network helps show where Amber M. Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber M. Bates

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber M. Bates. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber M. Bates based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber M. Bates. Amber M. Bates is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026