Amber M. Angell

49 total papers · 744 total citations
26 papers, 512 citations indexed

About

Amber M. Angell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber M. Angell has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 512 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Clinical Psychology, 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 9 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Amber M. Angell's work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (14 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (12 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (5 papers). Amber M. Angell is often cited by papers focused on Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (14 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (12 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (5 papers). Amber M. Angell collaborates with scholars based in United States. Amber M. Angell's co-authors include Olga Solomon, Lauren Harris, Laura A. Carpenter, Brittany N. Hand, Katharine E. Zuckerman, Allison Empey, Gelya Frank, Joy Hammel, Larry Yin and Natasha A. Spassiani and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Social Science & Medicine and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

In The Last Decade

Amber M. Angell

23 papers receiving 494 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Amber M. Angell	273	224	151	104	59	26	512
Consuelo Kreider	193 0.7×	150 0.7×	128 0.8×	42 0.4×	81 1.4×	33	490
Kiah Evans	383 1.4×	247 1.1×	197 1.3×	40 0.4×	78 1.3×	27	555
Ben Milbourn	197 0.7×	181 0.8×	94 0.6×	43 0.4×	42 0.7×	29	449
Laura Roche	412 1.5×	214 1.0×	107 0.7×	230 2.2×	91 1.5×	33	567
Donna Pennell	257 0.9×	298 1.3×	68 0.5×	83 0.8×	75 1.3×	24	486
Susan Toth‐Cohen	173 0.6×	199 0.9×	177 1.2×	97 0.9×	75 1.3×	24	501
Ellin Siegel-Causey	237 0.9×	245 1.1×	80 0.5×	174 1.7×	71 1.2×	15	599
Ellie Hartman	135 0.5×	104 0.5×	168 1.1×	44 0.4×	63 1.1×	34	615
Greet Lambrechts	280 1.0×	347 1.5×	124 0.8×	32 0.3×	50 0.8×	15	455
Ari Ne’eman	239 0.9×	161 0.7×	53 0.4×	25 0.2×	81 1.4×	25	461

Countries citing papers authored by Amber M. Angell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber M. Angell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber M. Angell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber M. Angell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber M. Angell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber M. Angell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber M. Angell. The network helps show where Amber M. Angell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber M. Angell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber M. Angell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber M. Angell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber M. Angell. Amber M. Angell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact