Amber J. Keyser

14 total papers · 831 total citations
12 papers, 652 citations indexed

About

Amber J. Keyser is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber J. Keyser has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 652 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Ecology, 7 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Amber J. Keyser's work include Avian ecology and behavior (10 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (7 papers) and Plant and animal studies (6 papers). Amber J. Keyser is often cited by papers focused on Avian ecology and behavior (10 papers), Animal Behavior and Reproduction (7 papers) and Plant and animal studies (6 papers). Amber J. Keyser collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Amber J. Keyser's co-authors include Geoffrey E. Hill, Daniel Promislow, Anne Charmantier, Lynn Siefferman, Susan L. Balenger, L. Scott Johnson, Matthew D. Shawkey, Kevin J. McGraw, Barbara Ballentine and Laura K. Estep and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, Conservation Biology and Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

In The Last Decade

Amber J. Keyser

11 papers receiving 590 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Amber J. Keyser 478 405 101 76 64 12 652
David S. Hinds 467 1.0× 639 1.6× 66 0.7× 88 1.2× 51 0.8× 23 785
Elke Schleucher 416 0.9× 487 1.2× 41 0.4× 64 0.8× 51 0.8× 21 713
Jonathan J. Storm 469 1.0× 309 0.8× 70 0.7× 69 0.9× 110 1.7× 24 701
Troy G. Murphy 611 1.3× 362 0.9× 95 0.9× 55 0.7× 80 1.3× 29 717
Claudia Mettke‐Hofmann 426 0.9× 256 0.6× 69 0.7× 54 0.7× 58 0.9× 12 586
Stuart C. Church 423 0.9× 247 0.6× 75 0.7× 87 1.1× 93 1.5× 17 587
Matthieu Paquet 429 0.9× 334 0.8× 104 1.0× 75 1.0× 105 1.6× 38 623
Gustav Kramer 243 0.5× 374 0.9× 62 0.6× 88 1.2× 30 0.5× 19 728
Charles E. Huntington 343 0.7× 386 1.0× 58 0.6× 55 0.7× 64 1.0× 19 758
Caron Y. Inouye 513 1.1× 294 0.7× 88 0.9× 43 0.6× 48 0.8× 12 648

Countries citing papers authored by Amber J. Keyser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber J. Keyser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber J. Keyser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber J. Keyser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber J. Keyser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber J. Keyser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber J. Keyser. The network helps show where Amber J. Keyser may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber J. Keyser

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber J. Keyser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber J. Keyser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber J. Keyser. Amber J. Keyser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026