Troy G. Murphy

926 total citations
29 papers, 720 citations indexed

About

Troy G. Murphy is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Troy G. Murphy has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 720 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 18 papers in Ecology and 4 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Troy G. Murphy's work include Animal Behavior and Reproduction (25 papers), Plant and animal studies (20 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (15 papers). Troy G. Murphy is often cited by papers focused on Animal Behavior and Reproduction (25 papers), Plant and animal studies (20 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (15 papers). Troy G. Murphy collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Mexico. Troy G. Murphy's co-authors include Keith A. Tarvin, Robert Montgomerie, Malcolm F. Rosenthal, Marcela Osorio‐Beristain, Michele A. Johnson, Kevin E. Omland, Edwin Scholes, Matthew E. Kaplan, Nancy A. Moran and Richard K. Simpson and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Animal Behaviour.

In The Last Decade

Troy G. Murphy

28 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Troy G. Murphy United States 16 616 365 119 95 84 29 720
Tim Schmoll Germany 19 755 1.2× 522 1.4× 187 1.6× 48 0.5× 40 0.5× 50 915
Sami M. Kivelä Finland 18 553 0.9× 369 1.0× 60 0.5× 64 0.7× 107 1.3× 43 789
Paulina L. González‐Gómez Chile 14 403 0.7× 256 0.7× 71 0.6× 64 0.7× 24 0.3× 28 569
Marie–Jeanne Holveck France 15 747 1.2× 407 1.1× 334 2.8× 93 1.0× 52 0.6× 27 862
Alice Exnerová Czechia 19 836 1.4× 261 0.7× 93 0.8× 141 1.5× 185 2.2× 46 1.0k
Thomas Van’t Hof Germany 9 512 0.8× 448 1.2× 198 1.7× 70 0.7× 21 0.3× 11 787
Craig A. Barnett United States 10 327 0.5× 205 0.6× 70 0.6× 37 0.4× 57 0.7× 18 413
Lars Erik Johannessen Norway 15 406 0.7× 278 0.8× 115 1.0× 28 0.3× 25 0.3× 26 523
Bettina Mahler Argentina 15 399 0.6× 525 1.4× 151 1.3× 54 0.6× 18 0.2× 63 745
Adrian Craig South Africa 13 344 0.6× 443 1.2× 63 0.5× 49 0.5× 17 0.2× 90 647

Countries citing papers authored by Troy G. Murphy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Troy G. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Troy G. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Troy G. Murphy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Troy G. Murphy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Troy G. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Troy G. Murphy. The network helps show where Troy G. Murphy may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Troy G. Murphy

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Troy G. Murphy. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Troy G. Murphy based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Troy G. Murphy. Troy G. Murphy is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Murphy, Troy G., et al.. (2019). Ritualized display of a leaf: A putative agonistic signal in both sexes of a tropical bird. Behavioural Processes. 168. 103954–103954. 1 indexed citations
2.
Murphy, Troy G., et al.. (2019). Painted Bunting ( Passerina ciris ) caught in the web of a giant lichen orb-weaver spider ( Araneus bicentenarius ). The Wilson Journal of Ornithology. 131(1). 191–194.
4.
Tarvin, Keith A., et al.. (2016). Dynamic Status Signal Reflects Outcome of Social Interactions, but Not Energetic Stress. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 4. 25 indexed citations
5.
Murphy, Troy G., et al.. (2014). Same trait, different receiver response: unlike females, male American goldfinches do not signal status with bill colour. Animal Behaviour. 93. 121–127. 14 indexed citations
6.
Pham, Tiffany, et al.. (2013). Honesty of a dynamic female aggressive status signal: baseline testosterone relates to bill color in female American goldfinches. Journal of Avian Biology. 45(1). 22–28. 14 indexed citations
7.
Murphy, Troy G., et al.. (2013). Colorful displays signal male quality in a tropical anole lizard. Die Naturwissenschaften. 100(10). 993–996. 36 indexed citations
8.
Murphy, Troy G., et al.. (2012). Carotenoid-Based Ornaments of Female and Male American Goldfinches (Spinus tristis) Show Sex-Specific Correlations with Immune Function and Metabolic Rate. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. 85(4). 348–363. 34 indexed citations
9.
Murphy, Troy G. & Tiffany Pham. (2012). Condition and brightness of structural blue-green: motmot tail-racket brightness is related to speed of feather growth in males, but not in females. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 106(3). 673–681. 14 indexed citations
10.
Rosenthal, Malcolm F., Troy G. Murphy, Nancy Darling, & Keith A. Tarvin. (2012). Ornamental bill color rapidly signals changing condition. Journal of Avian Biology. 43(6). 553–564. 41 indexed citations
11.
Tarvin, Keith A. & Troy G. Murphy. (2012). It isn't always sexy when both are bright and shiny: considering alternatives to sexual selection in elaborate monomorphic species. Ibis. 154(3). 439–443. 19 indexed citations
12.
Hall, Zachary J., Scott A. MacDougall‐Shackleton, Marcela Osorio‐Beristain, & Troy G. Murphy. (2010). Male Bias in the Song Control System despite Female Bias in Song Rate in Streak-Backed Orioles <i>(Icterus pustulatus)</i>. Brain Behavior and Evolution. 76(3-4). 168–175. 20 indexed citations
13.
Murphy, Troy G., Vanya G. Rohwer, & Edwin Scholes. (2010). Breeding biology and longevity of Russet-crowned Motmots in central Mexico. Journal of Field Ornithology. 81(1). 13–16. 8 indexed citations
14.
Murphy, Troy G., Malcolm F. Rosenthal, Robert Montgomerie, & Keith A. Tarvin. (2009). Female American goldfinches use carotenoid-based bill coloration to signal status. Behavioral Ecology. 20(6). 1348–1355. 85 indexed citations
16.
Price, J. Jordan, et al.. (2008). SEX-ROLE REVERSAL IN SONG? FEMALES SING MORE FREQUENTLY THAN MALES IN THE STREAK-BACKED ORIOLE. Ornithological Applications. 110(2). 387–392. 41 indexed citations
17.
Couri, Márcia Souto, et al.. (2007). Philornis fasciventris (Wulp) (Diptera: Muscidae): description of the male, larva and puparium, with notes on biology and host association. Neotropical Entomology. 36(6). 889–893. 5 indexed citations
18.
Murphy, Troy G.. (2007). Lack of melanized keratin and barbs that fall off: how the racketed tail of the turquoise-browed motmot Eumomota superciliosa is formed. Journal of Avian Biology. 38(2). 139–143. 5 indexed citations
19.
Murphy, Troy G.. (2007). Dishonest ‘preemptive’ pursuit-deterrent signal? Why the turquoise-browed motmot wags its tail before feeding nestlings. Animal Behaviour. 73(6). 965–970. 22 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026