Amber E. ten Hoedt
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber E. ten Hoedt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber E. ten Hoedt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber E. ten Hoedt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber E. ten Hoedt. Amber E. ten Hoedt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Amber E. ten Hoedt
7 papers receiving 281 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Amber E. ten Hoedt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber E. ten Hoedt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber E. ten Hoedt. The network helps show where Amber E. ten Hoedt may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Amber E. ten Hoedt
This map shows the geographic impact of Amber E. ten Hoedt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber E. ten Hoedt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber E. ten Hoedt more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.