Amanda Meyer

987 total citations · 1 hit paper
28 papers, 688 citations indexed

About

Amanda Meyer is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Meyer has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 688 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 12 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 10 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Amanda Meyer's work include Anatomy and Medical Technology (14 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (9 papers). Amanda Meyer is often cited by papers focused on Anatomy and Medical Technology (14 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (12 papers) and Surgical Simulation and Training (9 papers). Amanda Meyer collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Amanda Meyer's co-authors include A. Armson, Norman J. Stomski, Bruce F. Walker, Goran Štrkalj, Nalini Pather, JA Chapman, Stephanie J. Woodley, Phil Blyth, Mirjana Štrkalj and Natasha A.M.S. Flack and has published in prestigious journals such as Biochemistry, The FASEB Journal and Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Meyer

24 papers receiving 665 citations

Hit Papers

Forced Disruption of Anatomy Education in Australia and N... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda Meyer Australia 10 347 280 182 130 121 28 688
Natasha A.M.S. Flack New Zealand 8 303 0.9× 226 0.8× 257 1.4× 107 0.8× 85 0.7× 13 618
JA Chapman Australia 9 175 0.5× 232 0.8× 129 0.7× 100 0.8× 82 0.7× 23 809
Rodney A. Green Australia 17 539 1.6× 280 1.0× 487 2.7× 145 1.1× 185 1.5× 45 1.2k
James D. Pickering United Kingdom 21 385 1.1× 412 1.5× 273 1.5× 89 0.7× 264 2.2× 33 1.1k
Mirjana Štrkalj Australia 3 242 0.7× 143 0.5× 150 0.8× 106 0.8× 82 0.7× 5 436
Danya Stone United Kingdom 6 179 0.5× 153 0.5× 88 0.5× 121 0.9× 92 0.8× 7 401
Georga J. Longhurst United Kingdom 5 169 0.5× 156 0.6× 86 0.5× 121 0.9× 92 0.8× 7 398
Kate Dulohery Ireland 5 174 0.5× 165 0.6× 79 0.4× 120 0.9× 91 0.8× 7 412
Anneliese Hulme Australia 4 180 0.5× 146 0.5× 97 0.5× 102 0.8× 82 0.7× 9 371
Stefanie M. Attardi United States 11 315 0.9× 244 0.9× 171 0.9× 132 1.0× 293 2.4× 24 682

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Meyer. The network helps show where Amanda Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Meyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Meyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Meyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Meyer. Amanda Meyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hortsch, Michael, Virgínia Cláudia Carneiro Girão‐Carmona, Ilias P. Nikas, et al.. (2025). A global overview of anatomical science education and its present and future role in biomedical curricula. Anatomical Sciences Education. 19(1). 5–45.
2.
Meyer, Amanda & JA Chapman. (2024). A slide into obscurity? The current state of histology education in Australian and Aotearoa New Zealand medical curricula in 2022–2023. Anatomical Sciences Education. 17(9). 1694–1705. 2 indexed citations
4.
Hortsch, Michael, Virgínia Cláudia Carneiro Girão‐Carmona, Ilias P. Nikas, et al.. (2023). Teaching Cellular Architecture: The Global Status of Histology Education. Advances in experimental medicine and biology. 1431. 177–212. 5 indexed citations
5.
Carr, Sandra, et al.. (2022). Role of spatial ability, motivation and anxiety in learning neuroanatomy. Focus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional Journal. 23(1). 1–16.
6.
McNulty, Margaret A., et al.. (2021). NOMENs land: The place of eponyms in the anatomy classroom. Anatomical Sciences Education. 14(6). 847–852. 9 indexed citations
7.
Meyer, Amanda, et al.. (2021). Neuroanatomy Teaching in Australian and New Zealand Medical Schools. World Neurosurgery. 149. e217–e224. 9 indexed citations
8.
Pather, Nalini, Phil Blyth, JA Chapman, et al.. (2020). Forced Disruption of Anatomy Education in Australia and New Zealand: An Acute Response to the Covid‐19 Pandemic. Anatomical Sciences Education. 13(3). 284–300. 339 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Hennessy, Catherine, Danielle Royer, Amanda Meyer, & Claire F. Smith. (2020). Social Media Guidelines for Anatomists. Anatomical Sciences Education. 13(4). 527–539. 22 indexed citations
10.
Meguid, Eiman Abdel, Claire F. Smith, & Amanda Meyer. (2019). Examining the Motivation of Health Profession Students to Study Human Anatomy. Anatomical Sciences Education. 13(3). 343–352. 28 indexed citations
11.
Meyer, Amanda, et al.. (2017). Unravelling functional neurology: a scoping review of theories and clinical applications in a context of chiropractic manual therapy. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 25(1). 19–19. 7 indexed citations
12.
Grant, William D., et al.. (2017). Effective methods of teaching and learning in anatomy as a basic science: A BEME systematic review: BEME guide no. 44. Medical Teacher. 39(3). 234–243. 82 indexed citations
13.
Meyer, Amanda, et al.. (2016). The influence of anatomy app use on chiropractic students’ learning outcomes: a randomised controlled trial. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 24(1). 44–44. 8 indexed citations
14.
Stomski, Norman J., Paul Morrison, & Amanda Meyer. (2015). Antipsychotic medication side effect assessment tools: A systematic review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 50(5). 399–409. 21 indexed citations
15.
Meyer, Amanda, et al.. (2014). Capitalizing on Social and Transactional Learning to Challenge First-Grade Readers. ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University). 53(3). 25–44. 1 indexed citations
16.
Walker, Bruce F., et al.. (2014). The association between pain diagram area, fear-avoidance beliefs, and pain catastrophising. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies. 22(1). 5–5. 6 indexed citations
17.
Chapman, Peter D., et al.. (2014). Emphasis on various subtopics in the anatomy curriculum for chiropractic training: An international survey of chiropractors and anatomists. Journal of Chiropractic Education. 29(1). 37–42. 4 indexed citations
18.
Xiang, Dao Feng, Y. Patskovsky, Chengfu Xu, et al.. (2009). Functional Identification of Incorrectly Annotated Prolidases from the Amidohydrolase Superfamily of Enzymes. Biochemistry. 48(17). 3730–3742. 19 indexed citations
19.
Stucki, Anne, et al.. (1991). [Biliopancreatic bypass and disorders of iron absorption].. PubMed. 121(50). 1894–6. 3 indexed citations
20.
Solaro, R. John, et al.. (1989). Transitions in isoform populations of thick and thin filament proteins and calcium activation of force and ATP hydrolysis by cardiac myofilaments.. PubMed. 315. 487–502. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026