Amanda M. Fenner
Impact in
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products
- Pharmacology top 2%
- Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis
- Fungal Biology and Applications
Papers in
-
- Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects 1
- Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research 1
- Mitochondrial Function and Pathology 1
-
- Marine Sponges and Natural Products 5
- Co-authors
- William H. Gerwick (5 shared papers)Roger G. Linington (2 shared papers)Pieter C. Dorrestein (3 shared papers)Hosana Maria Debonsi (2 shared papers)Evgenia Glukhov (2 shared papers)Christopher M. Rath (1 shared paper)Weng Ruh Wong (1 shared paper)Xueting Liu (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Natural Products (3 papers)Carbohydrate Research (1 paper)Microbial Ecology (1 paper)ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (1 paper)Glycobiology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesPanamaBrazil
In The Last Decade
Amanda M. Fenner
10 papers receiving 726 citations
Amanda M. Fenner's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Biotechnology 194
- Pharmacology 332
- Molecular Biology 415
- Toxicology 19
- Pharmacology 38
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda M. Fenner
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda M. Fenner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda M. Fenner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda M. Fenner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda M. Fenner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda M. Fenner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda M. Fenner. The network helps show where Amanda M. Fenner may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda M. Fenner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Molecular Networking as a Dereplication Strategy Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 462 |
| 2 | 2012 | 90 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 72 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 51 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 3 |
About Amanda M. Fenner
Amanda M. Fenner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biotechnology, Organic Chemistry, Pharmacology and Cancer Research, having authored 10 papers that have together received 736 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Marine Sponges and Natural Products (5 papers), Microbial Natural Products and Biosynthesis (2 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (1 paper), Lung Cancer Research Studies (1 paper), Coenzyme Q10 studies and effects (1 paper), Synthesis and Biological Activity (1 paper), Glycosylation and Glycoproteins Research (1 paper) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biotechnology (194 citations), Pharmacology (332 citations), Molecular Biology (415 citations), Toxicology (19 citations) and Pharmacology (38 citations). Amanda M. Fenner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Panama and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include William H. Gerwick, Roger G. Linington, Pieter C. Dorrestein, Hosana Maria Debonsi, Evgenia Glukhov, Christopher M. Rath, Weng Ruh Wong, Xueting Liu, Laura M. Sanchez and Paul D. Boudreau. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Natural Products, Carbohydrate Research, Microbial Ecology, ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters and Glycobiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.