Fletcher W. Halliday

24 papers receiving 784 citations

Hit Papers

Towards common ground in the biodiversity–disease debate201920262021202320192024202550100150

Peers

Fletcher W. Halliday
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 257
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 217
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 216
  • Plant Science 196
  • Ecology 177
Replace Gabriel E. García‐Peña with:
Gabriel E. García‐Peña Mexico
Daniel L. Preston United States
Katherine L. D. Richgels United States
Erin L. Sauer United States
Saïd Nouira Tunisia
Jay Bowerman United States
Rachel M. Penczykowski United States
Renata L. Muylaert Brazil
Laurent Crespin France
Andrea Monaco Italy
Fletcher W. Halliday relative to Gabriel E. García‐Peña Mexico Gabriel E. García‐Peña's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.3×
Gabriel E. García‐Peña · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Fletcher W. Halliday

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fletcher W. Halliday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fletcher W. Halliday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fletcher W. Halliday more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fletcher W. Halliday

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fletcher W. Halliday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fletcher W. Halliday. The network helps show where Fletcher W. Halliday may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fletcher W. Halliday

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fletcher W. Halliday. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fletcher W. Halliday based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fletcher W. Halliday. Fletcher W. Halliday is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Pathogens and planetary changebreakdown →
13
2 0
3 0
4 27
5
A meta-analysis on global change drivers and the risk of infectious diseasebreakdown →
58
6 2
7 1
8 9
9 4
10 3
11 5
12 4
13 10
14 21
15 13
16 43
17 14
18
Towards common ground in the biodiversity–disease debatebreakdown →
186
19 35
20 39

About Fletcher W. Halliday

Fletcher W. Halliday is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 26 papers that have together received 795 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (8 papers), Zoonotic diseases and public health (8 papers) and Plant and animal studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (99 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (217 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (216 citations). Fletcher W. Halliday has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Jason R. Rohr, Peter A. Wilfahrt, Charles E. Mitchell, Robert W. Heckman, David J. Civitello, Erin A. Mordecai, Peter J. Hudson, Kevin D. Lafferty, Chelsea L. Wood and Kyle A. Palmquist. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026