Amanda J. Wright
Impact in
- Aging top 2%
- Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
- Plant Science top 5%
- Plant Molecular Biology Research
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
- Polysaccharides and Plant Cell Walls
Papers in
-
- Plant Reproductive Biology 4
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 3
-
- Plant Molecular Biology Research 4
- Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism 2
- Co-authors
- Craig P. Hunter (4 shared papers)Sabine Müller (2 shared papers)William M. Winston (2 shared papers)Marie E. Sutherlin (2 shared papers)Evan H. Feinberg (2 shared papers)Laurie G. Smith (2 shared papers)David W. Ehrhardt (1 shared paper)Carolyn G. Rasmussen (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Plant Cell (2 papers)Current Opinion in Plant Biology (1 paper)Current Biology (1 paper)Molecular Biology of the Cell (1 paper)Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Amanda J. Wright
11 papers receiving 816 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Aging 130
- Plant Science 427
- Cell Biology 156
- Molecular Biology 603
- Insect Science 62
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda J. Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda J. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda J. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda J. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda J. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda J. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda J. Wright. The network helps show where Amanda J. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Amanda J. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 233 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 115 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 105 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 81 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 80 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 71 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 54 | |
| 8 | 2003 | 43 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 22 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 13 |
About Amanda J. Wright
Amanda J. Wright is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Aging, Cell Biology and Ecology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 831 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms (4 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (4 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (4 papers), Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (3 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (3 papers), Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism (2 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (1 paper) and Genetic diversity and population structure (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (130 citations), Plant Science (427 citations), Cell Biology (156 citations), Molecular Biology (603 citations) and Insect Science (62 citations). Amanda J. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Craig P. Hunter, Sabine Müller, William M. Winston, Marie E. Sutherlin, Evan H. Feinberg, Laurie G. Smith, David W. Ehrhardt, Carolyn G. Rasmussen, Andrea Hinas and Kimberly L. Gallagher. Their work appears in journals such as The Plant Cell, Current Opinion in Plant Biology, Current Biology, Molecular Biology of the Cell and Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.