Michael H. Smith

4.5k total citations
138 papers, 3.5k citations indexed

About

Michael H. Smith is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael H. Smith has authored 138 papers receiving a total of 3.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 63 papers in Ecology, 58 papers in Genetics and 42 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Michael H. Smith's work include Genetic diversity and population structure (45 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (36 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (32 papers). Michael H. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Genetic diversity and population structure (45 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (36 papers) and Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (32 papers). Michael H. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States and Ukraine. Michael H. Smith's co-authors include Ronald K. Chesser, John C. Avise, Mark C. Belk, Robert K. Selander, Michael C. Wooten, Rebecca R. Sharitz, John B. Gentry, I. Lehr Brisbin, Paul E. Johns and J. Vaun McArthur and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The American Naturalist.

In The Last Decade

Michael H. Smith

134 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael H. Smith United States 37 1.7k 1.6k 881 718 528 138 3.5k
Johan Hollander Sweden 29 1.3k 0.8× 2.1k 1.3× 758 0.9× 1.2k 1.6× 564 1.1× 75 4.4k
Jeffry B. Mitton United States 44 2.2k 1.3× 2.1k 1.3× 1.7k 1.9× 1.4k 2.0× 1.3k 2.5× 105 5.6k
Bruno Streit Germany 38 1.8k 1.0× 837 0.5× 721 0.8× 737 1.0× 530 1.0× 119 4.1k
J. A. Beardmore United Kingdom 38 1.5k 0.9× 1.9k 1.2× 626 0.7× 432 0.6× 732 1.4× 117 3.9k
Craig A. Stockwell United States 21 949 0.5× 787 0.5× 843 1.0× 474 0.7× 374 0.7× 65 2.0k
Klaus Schwenk Germany 33 2.8k 1.6× 1.3k 0.8× 1.2k 1.3× 761 1.1× 353 0.7× 88 4.6k
Sandra J. Walde Canada 32 1.4k 0.8× 633 0.4× 1.4k 1.6× 633 0.9× 340 0.6× 65 2.8k
Jeffrey J. Hard United States 30 1.2k 0.7× 1.3k 0.8× 1.9k 2.2× 616 0.9× 821 1.6× 73 3.1k
Carol Eunmi Lee United States 28 2.4k 1.4× 1.2k 0.8× 1.2k 1.4× 941 1.3× 934 1.8× 47 4.4k
Elizabeth G. Boulding Canada 32 1.6k 0.9× 1.1k 0.7× 624 0.7× 393 0.5× 1.1k 2.1× 84 3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael H. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael H. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael H. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael H. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael H. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael H. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael H. Smith. The network helps show where Michael H. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael H. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael H. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael H. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael H. Smith. Michael H. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Winn, Richard N., et al.. (2008). Transgenic λ medaka as a new model for germ cell mutagenesis. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 49(3). 173–184. 14 indexed citations
3.
Tsyusko, Olga V., et al.. (2006). Genetics of cattails in radioactively contaminated areas around Chornobyl. Molecular Ecology. 15(9). 2611–2625. 12 indexed citations
4.
Purdue, James R., Tarás K. Oleksyk, & Michael H. Smith. (2006). Independent Occurrences of Multiple Repeats in the Control Region of Mitochondrial DNA of White-Tailed Deer. Journal of Heredity. 97(3). 235–243. 16 indexed citations
5.
Oleksyk, Tarás K., J. M. Novak, James R. Purdue, Sergey Gashchak, & Michael H. Smith. (2003). High levels of fluctuating asymmetry in populations of Apodemus flavicollis from the most contaminated areas in Chornobyl. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 73(1). 1–20. 40 indexed citations
6.
Peles, John D., Olin E. Rhodes, & Michael H. Smith. (2003). Spermatozoan numbers and characteristics of associated organs in male white-tailed deer during the breeding season. ACTA THERIOLOGICA. 48(1). 123–130.
7.
Oleksyk, Tarás K., Sergey Gashchak, Travis C. Glenn, et al.. (2002). Frequency distributions of 137Cs in fish and mammal populations. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity. 61(1). 55–74. 17 indexed citations
8.
Peles, John D., et al.. (1999). Genetic variation in a recently isolated population of mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). The Southwestern Naturalist. 44(2). 236–240. 1 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Kimberly G., Olin E. Rhodes, Ronald K. Chesser, & Michael H. Smith. (1997). Population Dynamics in Ecological Space and Time. Ornithological Applications. 99(4). 1016–1016. 24 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Michael H., et al.. (1994). Behavioral and Morphological Correlates of Heterochrony in Hispaniolan Palm-Tanagers. Ornithological Applications. 96(2). 433–446. 15 indexed citations
11.
Hundertmark, Kris J., Paul E. Johns, & Michael H. Smith. (1992). GENETIC DIVERSITY OF MOOSE FROM THE KENAI PENINSULA, ALASKA. Alces : A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose. 28. 15–20. 11 indexed citations
12.
Lydeard, Charles, Michael C. Wooten, & Michael H. Smith. (1991). Occurrence of Gambusia affinis in the Savannah and Chattahoochee Drainages: Previously Undescribed Geographic Contacts between G. affinis and G. holbrooki. Copeia. 1991(4). 1111–1111. 5 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Michael H., et al.. (1990). Speciation, Heterochrony, and Genetic Variation in Hispaniolan Palm-Tanagers. The Auk. 107(4). 707–717. 10 indexed citations
14.
Breshears, David D., Michael H. Smith, E. Gus Cothran, & Paul E. Johns. (1988). Genetic variability in white-tailed deer. Heredity. 60(1). 139–146. 24 indexed citations
15.
Kennedy, Michael L., et al.. (1985). Microgeographic Genetic Organization of Populations of Largemouth Bass and Two Other Species in a Reservoir. Copeia. 1985(1). 118–118. 13 indexed citations
16.
Scribner, Kim T., Michael H. Smith, & J. Whitfield Gibbons. (1984). GENETIC DIFFERENTIATION AMONG LOCAL POPULATIONS OF THE YELLOW-BELLIED SLIDER TURTLE (PSEUDEMYS SCRIPTA). Herpetologica. 40(4). 382–387. 13 indexed citations
17.
Cothran, E. Gus, Ronald K. Chesser, Michael H. Smith, & Paul E. Johns. (1983). INFLUENCES OF GENETIC VARIABILITY AND MATERNAL FACTORS ON FETAL GROWTH IN WHITE-TAILED DEER. Evolution. 37(2). 282–291. 58 indexed citations
18.
Sharitz, Rebecca R., et al.. (1980). COMPARISON OF ISOZYMES AMONG TYPHA SPECIES IN THE EASTERN UNITED STATES. American Journal of Botany. 67(9). 1297–1303. 52 indexed citations
19.
Avise, John C. & Michael H. Smith. (1974). Biochemical Genetics of Sunfish. II. Genic Similarity between Hybridizing Species. The American Naturalist. 108(962). 458–472. 55 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Michael H., et al.. (1969). Coat color and survival of displaced wild and laboratory reared old-field mice. ACTA THERIOLOGICA. 14. 1–9. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026