Amanda I. Gillespie
- Physiology top 5%
- Speech and Hearing top 0.5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jackie Gartner‐SchmidtKatherine Verdolini AbbottClark A. RosenScott D. RothenbergerLan YuAaron ZieglerElaine N. RubinsteinLibby J. Smith
- Topics
- Voice and Speech Disorders (46 papers)Dysphagia Assessment and Management (31 papers)Stuttering Research and Treatment (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaTürkiye
In The Last Decade
Amanda I. Gillespie
50 papers receiving 851 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Physiology 763
- Speech and Hearing 517
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 313
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 269
- Clinical Psychology 195
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda I. Gillespie
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda I. Gillespie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda I. Gillespie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda I. Gillespie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda I. Gillespie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda I. Gillespie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda I. Gillespie. The network helps show where Amanda I. Gillespie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda I. Gillespie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda I. Gillespie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda I. Gillespie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda I. Gillespie. Amanda I. Gillespie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 19 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 46 | |
| 19 | 43 | |
| 20 | 54 |
About Amanda I. Gillespie
Amanda I. Gillespie is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Physiology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 53 papers that have together received 863 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Voice and Speech Disorders (46 papers), Dysphagia Assessment and Management (31 papers) and Stuttering Research and Treatment (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (517 citations), Physiology (763 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (269 citations). Amanda I. Gillespie has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Jackie Gartner‐Schmidt, Katherine Verdolini Abbott, Clark A. Rosen, Scott D. Rothenberger, Lan Yu, Aaron Ziegler, Elaine N. Rubinstein, Libby J. Smith, William E. Gooding and VyVy N. Young. Their work appears in journals such as The Laryngoscope, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Otolaryngology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.