Amanda Driver

4.4k total citations
37 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Amanda Driver is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Driver has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 12 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 9 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Amanda Driver's work include Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (12 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (8 papers). Amanda Driver is often cited by papers focused on Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (12 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (8 papers) and Land Use and Ecosystem Services (8 papers). Amanda Driver collaborates with scholars based in South Africa, Australia and New Zealand. Amanda Driver's co-authors include Kristal Maze, Jeanne Nel, Philip Desmet, Richard M. Cowling, Mathieu Rouget, Dirk J. Roux, Belinda Reyers, Emily Nicholson, Liesl Hill and Bethanna Jackson and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Conservation Biology.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Driver

37 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda Driver South Africa 17 787 432 335 329 229 37 1.3k
Rachel Neugarten United States 12 574 0.7× 451 1.0× 168 0.5× 259 0.8× 147 0.6× 18 1.1k
Brian Czech United States 17 420 0.5× 438 1.0× 226 0.7× 351 1.1× 225 1.0× 37 1.2k
G. Long United States 9 530 0.7× 400 0.9× 270 0.8× 264 0.8× 246 1.1× 12 1.3k
Prue Addison United Kingdom 20 693 0.9× 485 1.1× 597 1.8× 234 0.7× 318 1.4× 35 1.6k
Michelle Venter Australia 9 1.0k 1.3× 517 1.2× 227 0.7× 348 1.1× 182 0.8× 11 1.7k
Adena R. Rissman United States 22 914 1.2× 362 0.8× 191 0.6× 245 0.7× 421 1.8× 65 1.5k
Rebecca K. Runting Australia 22 1.1k 1.5× 720 1.7× 301 0.9× 211 0.6× 250 1.1× 46 1.9k
Holly Doremus United States 18 436 0.6× 267 0.6× 274 0.8× 182 0.6× 262 1.1× 66 1.1k
Aaron Bruner United States 12 1.0k 1.3× 486 1.1× 382 1.1× 235 0.7× 616 2.7× 17 1.6k
Benoı̂t Mertens Belgium 11 994 1.3× 397 0.9× 170 0.5× 190 0.6× 243 1.1× 19 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Driver

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Driver's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Driver with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Driver more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Driver

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Driver. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Driver. The network helps show where Amanda Driver may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Driver

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Driver. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Driver based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Driver. Amanda Driver is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Driver, Amanda, et al.. (2024). Synergies and complementarities between ecosystem accounting and the Red List of Ecosystems. Nature Ecology & Evolution. 8(10). 1794–1803. 4 indexed citations
2.
King, Steven, Amanda Driver, Elise M. S. Belle, et al.. (2023). Accounting for protected areas: Approaches and applications. Ecosystem Services. 63. 101544–101544. 9 indexed citations
3.
Harris, Linda R., et al.. (2022). A robust, systematic approach for developing the biodiversity sector's input for multi-sector Marine Spatial Planning. Ocean & Coastal Management. 230. 106368–106368. 14 indexed citations
4.
Czúcz, Bálint, Heather Keith, Amanda Driver, et al.. (2021). A common typology for ecosystem characteristics and ecosystem condition variables. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6. 40 indexed citations
5.
Czúcz, Bálint, Heather Keith, Joachim Maes, et al.. (2021). Selection criteria for ecosystem condition indicators. Ecological Indicators. 133. 108376–108376. 54 indexed citations
6.
Keith, Heather, Bálint Czúcz, Bethanna Jackson, et al.. (2020). A conceptual framework and practical structure for implementing ecosystem condition accounts. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5. 33 indexed citations
7.
Maes, Joachim, Amanda Driver, Bálint Czúcz, et al.. (2020). A review of ecosystem condition accounts: lessons learned and options for further development. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 5. 40 indexed citations
8.
Holness, Stephen, Kerry Sink, Andrew Skowno, et al.. (2019). Practical actions for applied systematic conservation planning. Conservation Biology. 33(6). 1235–1246. 29 indexed citations
9.
Skowno, Andrew, Kerry Sink, Heidi van Deventer, et al.. (2019). National Biodiversity Assessment 2018: The status of South Africa’s ecosystems and biodiversity. Synthesis Report. Synthesis Report. South African National Biodiversity Institute, an entity of the Department of Environment, Forestry and Fisheries, Pretoria. 14 indexed citations
10.
Czúcz, Bálint, Heather Keith, Bethanna Jackson, et al.. (2019). Discussion paper 2.3:Proposed typology of condition variables for ecosystem accounting and criteria for selection of condition variables. 1 indexed citations
11.
Nel, Jeanne, Dirk J. Roux, Amanda Driver, et al.. (2015). Knowledge co‐production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans. Conservation Biology. 30(1). 176–188. 158 indexed citations
12.
Nel, Jeanne & Amanda Driver. (2015). National River Ecosystem Accounts for South Africa. Discussion document for Advancing SEEA Experimental Ecosystem Accounting Project. 3 indexed citations
13.
Driver, Amanda, et al.. (2015). Land and ecosystem accounting in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa: A discussion document. 1 indexed citations
14.
Roux, Dirk J., et al.. (2011). Absorptive Capacity as a Guiding Concept for Effective Public Sector Management and Conservation of Freshwater Ecosystems. Environmental Management. 47(5). 917–925. 17 indexed citations
15.
Nel, Jeanne, Dirk J. Roux, Amanda Driver, et al.. (2011). Technical report for the national freshwater ecosystem priority areas project. Report to the water research commission.. 2 indexed citations
17.
Reyers, Belinda, Mathieu Rouget, Richard M. Cowling, et al.. (2007). Developing products for conservation decision‐making: lessons from a spatial biodiversity assessment for South Africa. Diversity and Distributions. 13(5). 608–619. 43 indexed citations
18.
Knight, Andrew T., Amanda Driver, Richard M. Cowling, et al.. (2006). Designing Systematic Conservation Assessments that Promote Effective Implementation: Best Practice from South Africa. Conservation Biology. 20(3). 739–750. 182 indexed citations
19.
Driver, Amanda, Richard M. Cowling, & Kristal Maze. (2003). Planning for Living Landscapes: Perspectives and Lessons from South Africa. 32 indexed citations
20.
Driver, Amanda, Philip Desmet, Mathieu Rouget, R. M. Cowling, & Kristal Maze. (2003). Succulent Karoo Ecosystem Plan. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026