Amanda Demeter
Impact in
-
- Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
-
- Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
Papers in
-
- Autophagy in Disease and Therapy 5
-
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation 2
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
- Co-authors
- Tamás Korcsmáros (7 shared papers)Dávid Fazekas (4 shared papers)Katalin Lenti (3 shared papers)Dénes Türei (3 shared papers)László Földvári-Nagy (2 shared papers)Márton Ölbei (3 shared papers)Tibor Vellai (3 shared papers)Dezső Módos (3 shared papers)
- Journals
- Autophagy (3 papers)Scientific Reports (1 paper)Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (1 paper)International Journal of Molecular Sciences (1 paper)Biomedicines (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- HungaryUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Amanda Demeter
10 papers receiving 208 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 23
- Epidemiology 101
- Endocrinology 13
- Cancer Research 26
- Molecular Biology 114
Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Demeter
This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Demeter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Demeter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Demeter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Demeter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Demeter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Demeter. The network helps show where Amanda Demeter may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Demeter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 34 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 32 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 1 |
About Amanda Demeter
Amanda Demeter is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Endocrinology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 10 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autophagy in Disease and Therapy (5 papers), Vibrio bacteria research studies (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (1 paper), MicroRNA in disease regulation (1 paper), Gestational Trophoblastic Disease Studies (1 paper) and Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (23 citations), Epidemiology (101 citations), Endocrinology (13 citations), Cancer Research (26 citations) and Molecular Biology (114 citations). Amanda Demeter has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tamás Korcsmáros, Dávid Fazekas, Katalin Lenti, Dénes Türei, László Földvári-Nagy, Márton Ölbei, Tibor Vellai, Dezső Módos, Péter Csermely and Padhmanand Sudhakar. Their work appears in journals such as Autophagy, Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and Biomedicines.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.