Amanda Choo

541 total citations
18 papers, 329 citations indexed

About

Amanda Choo is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Insect Science and Genetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Amanda Choo has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 329 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Molecular Biology, 9 papers in Insect Science and 7 papers in Genetics. Recurrent topics in Amanda Choo's work include Insect behavior and control techniques (8 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (6 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (6 papers). Amanda Choo is often cited by papers focused on Insect behavior and control techniques (8 papers), Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences (6 papers) and Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (6 papers). Amanda Choo collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Italy and Austria. Amanda Choo's co-authors include Louise V. O’Keefe, Robert I. Richards, Simon W. Baxter, Sonia Dayan, Robert Saint, Peter A. Crisp, John B. Bruning, Thu Nguyen, Stephen L. Gregory and Zeeshan Shaukat and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Oncogene and Human Molecular Genetics.

In The Last Decade

Amanda Choo

17 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amanda Choo Australia 11 229 122 118 61 38 18 329
Anne‐Marie Birot France 10 406 1.8× 79 0.6× 45 0.4× 9 0.1× 25 0.7× 14 554
Małgorzata Cebrat Poland 11 159 0.7× 94 0.8× 56 0.5× 28 0.5× 5 0.1× 29 306
Brice Ronsin France 10 159 0.7× 46 0.4× 25 0.2× 69 1.1× 4 0.1× 20 285
Lori A. Pile United States 19 602 2.6× 85 0.7× 15 0.1× 47 0.8× 8 0.2× 30 702
Einat Cinnamon Israel 7 178 0.8× 81 0.7× 63 0.5× 102 1.7× 2 0.1× 8 309
Nattaphong Rattanavirotkul United Kingdom 6 223 1.0× 36 0.3× 51 0.4× 64 1.0× 4 0.1× 7 435
Davide Andrenacci Italy 11 268 1.2× 55 0.5× 12 0.1× 39 0.6× 6 0.2× 23 377
Stephen A. Rose United Kingdom 7 292 1.3× 69 0.6× 16 0.1× 96 1.6× 8 0.2× 10 440
Christo P. Christov United Kingdom 12 494 2.2× 39 0.3× 40 0.3× 103 1.7× 5 0.1× 14 638
Nichole Link United States 9 230 1.0× 36 0.3× 41 0.3× 37 0.6× 2 0.1× 17 353

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Choo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Choo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Choo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Choo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Choo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Choo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Choo. The network helps show where Amanda Choo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amanda Choo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amanda Choo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amanda Choo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amanda Choo. Amanda Choo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Paulo, Daniel F., Thu Nguyen, Christopher M. Ward, et al.. (2025). Functional genomics implicates ebony in the black pupae phenotype of tephritid fruit flies. Communications Biology. 8(1). 60–60. 6 indexed citations
2.
Nguyen, Thu, Amanda Choo, & Simon W. Baxter. (2024). Conservation of shibire and RpII215 temperature-sensitive lethal mutations between Drosophila and Bactrocera tryoni. Frontiers in Insect Science. 4. 1249103–1249103.
3.
Choo, Amanda, Dani L. Webber, Paul J. Trim, et al.. (2024). Drosophila melanogastermodels ofMPS IIIC(Hgsnat‐deficiency) highlight the role of glia in disease presentation. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 47(2). 340–354. 1 indexed citations
4.
Choo, Amanda, et al.. (2022). CRISPR/Cas9 Mutagenesis to Generate Novel Traits in Bactrocera tryoni for Sterile Insect Technique. Methods in molecular biology. 2495. 151–171. 3 indexed citations
5.
Nguyen, Thu, Amanda Choo, & Simon W. Baxter. (2021). Lessons from Drosophila: Engineering Genetic Sexing Strains with Temperature-Sensitive Lethality for Sterile Insect Technique Applications. Insects. 12(3). 243–243. 17 indexed citations
6.
Choo, Amanda, et al.. (2021). Molecular Biology of the WWOX Gene That Spans Chromosomal Fragile Site FRA16D. Cells. 10(7). 1637–1637. 6 indexed citations
7.
Choo, Amanda, et al.. (2020). Precise single base substitution in the shibire gene by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated homology directed repair in Bactrocera tryoni. BMC Genetics. 21(S2). 127–127. 14 indexed citations
8.
Nguyen, Thu, Christopher M. Ward, Peter A. Crisp, et al.. (2020). Disruption of duplicated yellow genes in Bactrocera tryoni modifies pigmentation colouration and impacts behaviour. Journal of Pest Science. 94(3). 917–932. 5 indexed citations
9.
Choo, Amanda, Thu Nguyen, Christopher M. Ward, et al.. (2019). Identification of Y‐chromosome scaffolds of the Queensland fruit fly reveals a duplicated gyf gene paralogue common to many Bactrocera pest species. Insect Molecular Biology. 28(6). 873–886. 10 indexed citations
10.
Webber, Dani L., Amanda Choo, Paul J. Trim, et al.. (2018). Neuronal-specific impairment of heparan sulfate degradation in Drosophila reveals pathogenic mechanisms for Mucopolysaccharidosis type IIIA. Experimental Neurology. 303. 38–47. 17 indexed citations
11.
Choo, Amanda, Peter A. Crisp, Robert Saint, Louise V. O’Keefe, & Simon W. Baxter. (2017). CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated mutagenesis of the white gene in the tephritid pest Bactrocera tryoni. Journal of Applied Entomology. 142(1-2). 52–58. 43 indexed citations
12.
Bruning, John B., et al.. (2016). Expressing a moth abcc2 gene in transgenic Drosophila causes susceptibility to Bt Cry1Ac without requiring a cadherin-like protein receptor. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. 80. 61–70. 43 indexed citations
13.
O’Keefe, Louise V., et al.. (2015). Tumor Suppressor WWOX Contributes to the Elimination of Tumorigenic Cells in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE. 10(8). e0136356–e0136356. 15 indexed citations
14.
Choo, Amanda, Louise V. O’Keefe, Stephen L. Gregory, et al.. (2015). Tumor suppressor WWOX moderates the mitochondrial respiratory complex. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 54(12). 745–761. 19 indexed citations
15.
Richards, Robert I., et al.. (2015). WWOX, the chromosomal fragile site FRA16D spanning gene: Its role in metabolism and contribution to cancer. Experimental Biology and Medicine. 240(3). 338–344. 25 indexed citations
16.
Shaukat, Zeeshan, Dawei Liu, Amanda Choo, et al.. (2014). Chromosomal instability causes sensitivity to metabolic stress. Oncogene. 34(31). 4044–4055. 36 indexed citations
17.
Dayan, Sonia, Louise V. O’Keefe, Amanda Choo, & Robert I. Richards. (2013). Common chromosomal fragile site FRA16D tumor suppressor WWOX gene expression and metabolic reprograming in cells. Genes Chromosomes and Cancer. 52(9). 823–831. 21 indexed citations
18.
O’Keefe, Louise V., Alex D. Colella, Sonia Dayan, et al.. (2010). Drosophila orthologue of WWOX, the chromosomal fragile site FRA16D tumour suppressor gene, functions in aerobic metabolism and regulates reactive oxygen species. Human Molecular Genetics. 20(3). 497–509. 48 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026