Amanda Broderick

669 citations
9 papers · 468 indexed · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Amanda Broderick

8 papers receiving 445 citations

Peers

Amanda Broderick
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Clinical Psychology 331
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 272
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 30
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 55
  • Social Psychology 100
Replace Dominic T. Plant with:
Dominic T. Plant United Kingdom
Emily Savage‐McGlynn United Kingdom
Angelika Wiebel Germany
Shaun Sweeney Australia
Sarah E. D. Perzow United States
Martha Hart Canada
Maureen E. Schuler United States
Margarita Prodromidis United States
Juan Manzano Switzerland
Vania Valoriani Italy
Amanda Broderick relative to Dominic T. Plant United Kingdom Dominic T. Plant's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Dominic T. Plant · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Amanda Broderick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amanda Broderick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amanda Broderick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amanda Broderick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amanda Broderick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amanda Broderick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amanda Broderick. The network helps show where Amanda Broderick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Amanda Broderick, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Amanda Broderick Line = papers co-authored together Amanda Broderick links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1 20206
2 20195
3 201945
4
Interventions to Improve the Treatment of Malaria in an Acute Teaching Hospital in Ireland.
20170
5 201488
6 201364
7 2012214
8
[Compliance with nCPAP therapy: is prediction possible?].
19951
9 199445

About Amanda Broderick

Amanda Broderick is a scholar working on Family Practice, Behavioral Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology, Speech and Hearing and Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 468 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child Abuse and Trauma (3 papers), Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum (2 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (1 paper) and Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (331 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (272 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (30 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (55 citations) and Social Psychology (100 citations). Amanda Broderick has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Maria Muzik, Katherine L. Rosenblum, Julia S. Seng, Erika L. Bocknek, Patricia A. Richardson, Colette V. Browne, Ellen W. McGinnis, Rosalind Kirk, Cecilia Martinez‐Torteya and Caroline Bonham. Their work appears in journals such as Child Abuse & Neglect, Developmental Psychobiology, Archives of Women s Mental Health, Development and Psychopathology and PEDIATRICS.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026