Allison Williams

581 total citations
21 papers, 360 citations indexed

About

Allison Williams is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Allison Williams has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 360 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Allison Williams's work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers). Allison Williams is often cited by papers focused on Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (4 papers) and Electoral Systems and Political Participation (3 papers). Allison Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Allison Williams's co-authors include Christopher M. Federico, Joseph A. Vitriol, Acacia C. Parks, Ryan Honomichl, Eugene Borgida, Michal Reifen Tagar, Chad S. Dodson, William Montelpare, Danny Liew and Elizabeth Manias and has published in prestigious journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition and International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Allison Williams

19 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Allison Williams
Laura J. Ferris Australia
Diana Cárdenas Australia
Grace Kao United States
Jerry Cullum United States
Ryan H. Bremner United States
Diyang Qu China
Samuel D. Lustgarten United States
Katherine S. Zee United States
Patrick Boyd United States
Laura J. Ferris Australia
Allison Williams
Citations per year, relative to Allison Williams Allison Williams (= 1×) peers Laura J. Ferris

Countries citing papers authored by Allison Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Allison Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Allison Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Allison Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Allison Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Allison Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Allison Williams. The network helps show where Allison Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Allison Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Allison Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Allison Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Allison Williams. Allison Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gonzales, Marti Hope, et al.. (2024). On the Defensive: Identity, Language, and Partisan Reactions to Political Scandal. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 51(11). 2323–2340.
2.
Ravensbergen, Léa, et al.. (2024). Double-Duty Carers’ Health and Wellbeing during COVID-19: Exploring the Role of Mobility of the Care Economy in Southern Ontario, Canada. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 21(6). 730–730.
3.
O’Shea, Brian, et al.. (2021). Exposure and Aversion to Human Transmissible Diseases Predict Conservative Ideological and Partisan Preferences. Political Psychology. 43(1). 65–88. 18 indexed citations
4.
Williams, Allison, et al.. (2020). Capturing the impacts of balancing caring and employment: a photovoice study of Filipino-Canadian transnational working carers. International Journal of Care and Caring. 5(2). 335–363. 2 indexed citations
5.
Hunter, John F., et al.. (2019). Effect of Brief Biofeedback via a Smartphone App on Stress Recovery: Randomized Experimental Study. JMIR Serious Games. 7(4). e15974–e15974. 31 indexed citations
6.
Parks, Acacia C., et al.. (2019). The Effects of a Digital Well-Being Intervention on Patients With Chronic Conditions: Observational Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 22(1). e16211–e16211. 29 indexed citations
7.
Williams, Allison, et al.. (2019). Social Network Disagreement and Reasoned Candidate Preferences. American Politics Research. 48(1). 132–154. 5 indexed citations
8.
Federico, Christopher M., Allison Williams, & Joseph A. Vitriol. (2018). The role of system identity threat in conspiracy theory endorsement. European Journal of Social Psychology. 48(7). 927–938. 52 indexed citations
9.
Parks, Acacia C., et al.. (2018). Testing a scalable web and smartphone based intervention to improve depression, anxiety, and resilience: A randomized controlled trial. International Journal of Wellbeing. 8(2). 22–67. 35 indexed citations
10.
Williams, Allison, Li Wang, Wendy Duggleby, Maureen Markle‐Reid, & Jenny Ploeg. (2017). Gender and sex differences in carers’ health, burden and work outcomes: Canadian carers of community-dwelling older people with multiple chronic conditions. International Journal of Care and Caring. 1(3). 331–349. 8 indexed citations
11.
Andow, David A., Eugene Borgida, Terrance M. Hurley, & Allison Williams. (2016). Recruitment and Retention of Volunteers in a Citizen Science Network to Detect Invasive Species on Private Lands. Environmental Management. 58(4). 606–618. 28 indexed citations
12.
Federico, Christopher M., et al.. (2016). Epistemic Motivation and the Structure of Moral Intuition: Dispositional Need for Closure as a Predictor of Individualizing and Binding Morality. European Journal of Personality. 30(3). 227–239. 36 indexed citations
13.
Borgida, Eugene, Barbara Loken, Allison Williams, et al.. (2015). Assessing Constituent Levels in Smokeless Tobacco Products: A New Approach to Engaging and Educating the Public. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 17(11). 1354–1361. 12 indexed citations
14.
Braaf, Sandra, et al.. (2014). Pharmacists’ Interprofessional Communication About Medications in Specialty Hospital Settings. Health Communication. 30(11). 1065–1075. 33 indexed citations
15.
Chen, Philip G., Eugene Borgida, Timothy Callaghan, et al.. (2014). The Minnesota Multi‐Investigator 2012 Presidential Election Panel Study. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 14(1). 78–104. 11 indexed citations
16.
Gonzales, Marti Hope, et al.. (2013). Forgiveness aversion: developing a motivational state measure of perceived forgiveness risks. Motivation and Emotion. 38(3). 378–400. 10 indexed citations
17.
Dodson, Chad S., et al.. (2008). Stereotypes and retrieval-provoked illusory source recollections.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 34(3). 460–477. 24 indexed citations
18.
Williams, Allison, et al.. (2003). THE INFLUENCE OF INCOME ON THE EXPERIENCE OF INFORMAL CAREGIVING: POLICY IMPLICATIONS. Health Care For Women International. 24(4). 280–291. 1 indexed citations
19.
Montelpare, William & Allison Williams. (2000). Web-based learning: Challenges in using the Internet in the undergraduate curriculum.. Education and Information Technologies. 5(2). 85–101. 16 indexed citations
20.
Preston, Valerie, John Holmes, & Allison Williams. (1997). WORKING WITH ‘WILD ROSE I’: LEAN PRODUCTION IN A GREENFIELD MILL. Canadian Geographies / Géographies canadiennes. 41(1). 88–104. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026