Kate Clay
Impact in
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer survivorship and care
- Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Papers in
- Pharmacy 3
- Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues 3
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 6
- Co-authors
- Stephen KearingAnnette M. O’ConnorE. Dale CollinsIan D. GrahamCarol BennettElizabeth KristjanssonSusie GagnonKaren L. Gillock
- Journals
- Cancer (1 paper)Journal of Clinical Oncology (1 paper)Health Affairs (1 paper)The Journal of Urology (1 paper)Canadian Family Physician (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Kate Clay
10 papers receiving 877 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- General Health Professions 494
- Oncology 327
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 258
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 156
- Family Practice 17
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Clay
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Clay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Clay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Clay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Clay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Clay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Clay. The network helps show where Kate Clay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Kate Clay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Transitioning to "perfected" informed consent. Mutual understanding calls for shared decision making. | 2011 | 3 |
| 2 | Are you SURE | 2010 | 4 |
| 3 | Are You SURE?: Assessing Patient Decisional Conflict with a 4-Item Screening Test. Copyright: The College of Family Physicians of Canada | 2010 | 4 |
| 4 | Are you SURE?: Assessing patient decisional conflict with a 4-item screening test. | 2010 | 204 |
| 5 | 2009 | 203 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 171 | |
| 8 | 2007 | 81 | |
| 9 | 2006 | 236 | |
| 10 | The Papanicolaou smear. | 1992 | 18 |
About Kate Clay
Kate Clay is a scholar working on Pharmacy, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Oncology and Genetics, having authored 10 papers that have together received 925 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (6 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (3 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (2 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (2 papers), Spider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies (1 paper), BRCA gene mutations in cancer (1 paper) and Cancer survivorship and care (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (494 citations), Oncology (327 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (258 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (156 citations) and Family Practice (17 citations). Kate Clay has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Stephen Kearing, Annette M. O’Connor, E. Dale Collins, Ian D. Graham, Carol Bennett, Elizabeth Kristjansson, Susie Gagnon, Karen L. Gillock, Michel Rousseau and Tim A. Ahles. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Health Affairs, The Journal of Urology and Canadian Family Physician.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.