Alison Harper

485 total citations
38 papers, 277 citations indexed

About

Alison Harper is a scholar working on Emergency Medical Services, Management Science and Operations Research and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Alison Harper has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 277 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Emergency Medical Services, 13 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 11 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Alison Harper's work include Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (18 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (9 papers). Alison Harper is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization (18 papers), Simulation Techniques and Applications (10 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (9 papers). Alison Harper collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Norway and United States. Alison Harper's co-authors include Navonil Mustafee, Mike Yearworth, Andreas Tolk, Thomas Monks, Bhakti Stephan Onggo, Martin Pitt, J. H. Powell, Joe Viana, Mark Feeney and Masoud Fakhimi and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and European Journal of Operational Research.

In The Last Decade

Alison Harper

34 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Alison Harper United Kingdom 9 94 85 52 48 45 38 277
Kirandeep Chahal United Kingdom 7 159 1.7× 101 1.2× 34 0.7× 59 1.2× 54 1.2× 8 293
Saeedeh Ketabi Iran 10 102 1.1× 39 0.5× 28 0.5× 31 0.6× 64 1.4× 41 320
Julie Eatock United Kingdom 12 55 0.6× 73 0.9× 23 0.4× 99 2.1× 61 1.4× 20 336
Giuseppe Converso Italy 7 35 0.4× 29 0.3× 35 0.7× 42 0.9× 29 0.6× 20 251
Siebren Groothuis Netherlands 10 43 0.5× 115 1.4× 22 0.4× 66 1.4× 72 1.6× 18 276
Joe Viana Norway 11 208 2.2× 169 2.0× 42 0.8× 55 1.1× 94 2.1× 33 405
Vera Tilson United States 10 138 1.5× 81 1.0× 75 1.4× 139 2.9× 71 1.6× 44 370
Seung Chul Kim United States 8 65 0.7× 181 2.1× 93 1.8× 149 3.1× 95 2.1× 22 432
Youxu C. Tjader United States 8 133 1.4× 73 0.9× 17 0.3× 115 2.4× 60 1.3× 9 385
Waleed Abo-Hamad Ireland 9 87 0.9× 198 2.3× 20 0.4× 79 1.6× 115 2.6× 22 336

Countries citing papers authored by Alison Harper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alison Harper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alison Harper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alison Harper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alison Harper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alison Harper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alison Harper. The network helps show where Alison Harper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alison Harper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alison Harper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alison Harper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alison Harper. Alison Harper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Alidoost, F., Navonil Mustafee, Thomas Monks, & Alison Harper. (2025). Simulation in healthcare supply chains with perishable products: a scoping review. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 77(3). 871–907. 2 indexed citations
3.
Monks, Thomas, et al.. (2025). Unlocking the potential of past research: using generative AI to reconstruct healthcare simulation models. Journal of the Operational Research Society. 1–24. 1 indexed citations
4.
Wilson, Rebecca, Maria Theresa Redaniel, Emily Eyles, et al.. (2024). Risk factors for prolonged length of hospital stay following elective hip replacement surgery: a retrospective longitudinal observational study. BMJ Open. 14(8). e078108–e078108. 1 indexed citations
5.
Monks, Thomas, Alison Harper, & Navonil Mustafee. (2024). Towards sharing tools and artefacts for reusable simulations in healthcare. Journal of Simulation. 19(6). 619–638. 5 indexed citations
6.
Mustafee, Navonil, Alison Harper, Joe Viana, & Thomas Monks. (2024). A Maturity Model for Digital Twins in Healthcare. 1151–1162.
7.
Harper, Alison, Thomas Monks, Rebecca Wilson, et al.. (2023). Development and application of simulation modelling for orthopaedic elective resource planning in England. BMJ Open. 13(12). e076221–e076221. 4 indexed citations
8.
Monks, Thomas & Alison Harper. (2023). Computer model and code sharing practices in healthcare discrete-event simulation: a systematic scoping review. Journal of Simulation. 19(1). 108–123. 9 indexed citations
9.
Harper, Alison & Thomas Monks. (2023). A Framework to Share Healthcare Simulations on the Web Using Free and Open Source Tools and Python. 250–260. 5 indexed citations
10.
Monks, Thomas & Alison Harper. (2023). Improving the usability of open health service delivery simulation models using Python and web apps. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3. 48–48. 3 indexed citations
11.
Monks, Thomas, et al.. (2023). Forecasting the daily demand for emergency medical ambulances in England and Wales: a benchmark model and external validation. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 23(1). 117–117.
12.
Harper, Alison, Navonil Mustafee, & Joe Viana. (2023). Real-time Simulation in Urgent and Emergency Care: A Transformative Shift towards Responsive Decision-making. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
13.
Harper, Alison & Navonil Mustafee. (2023). Participatory design research for the development of real-time simulation models in healthcare. Health Systems. 12(4). 375–386. 8 indexed citations
15.
Wood, Richard M., et al.. (2022). The False Economy of Seeking to Eliminate Delayed Transfers of Care: Some Lessons from Queueing Theory. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy. 21(2). 243–251. 1 indexed citations
16.
Wilson, Rebecca, Maria Theresa Redaniel, Emily Eyles, et al.. (2022). Identification of risk factors associated with prolonged hospital stay following primary knee replacement surgery: a retrospective, longitudinal observational study. BMJ Open. 12(12). e068252–e068252. 1 indexed citations
17.
Mustafee, Navonil, Alison Harper, & Masoud Fakhimi. (2022). From Conceptualization of Hybrid Modelling & Simulation to Empirical Studies in Hybrid Modelling. 2022 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC). 1199–1210. 4 indexed citations
18.
Mustafee, Navonil, Alison Harper, & Bhakti Stephan Onggo. (2020). Hybrid Modelling and Simulation (M&S): Driving Innovation in the Theory and Practice of M&S. Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter). 3140–3151. 24 indexed citations
19.
Tolk, Andreas, Alison Harper, & Navonil Mustafee. (2020). Hybrid models as transdisciplinary research enablers. European Journal of Operational Research. 291(3). 1075–1090. 51 indexed citations
20.
Mustafee, Navonil, J. H. Powell, & Alison Harper. (2018). RH-RT: a data analytics framework for reducing wait time at emergency departments and centres for urgent care. Winter Simulation Conference. 100–110. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026