Mark Feeney

1.7k total citations
35 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Mark Feeney is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Feeney has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Oncology and 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Mark Feeney's work include Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (8 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (6 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (5 papers). Mark Feeney is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (8 papers), Surgical Simulation and Training (6 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (5 papers). Mark Feeney collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and United States. Mark Feeney's co-authors include Duncan A. Robertson, Stephen G. Ward, Karen L. Wright, Melanie J. Welham, Siwan Thomas‐Gibson, Jonathon Snook, J J T Tate, Nicholas Rooney, Rupert Pullan and Colin Rees and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

Mark Feeney

29 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Mark Feeney 413 360 342 235 147 35 1.1k
Caroline Swan 90 0.2× 285 0.8× 80 0.2× 135 0.6× 218 1.5× 36 943
Wim P.M. Hopman 79 0.2× 864 2.4× 273 0.8× 477 2.0× 213 1.4× 76 1.7k
Maria D. Hurtado 178 0.4× 283 0.8× 79 0.2× 41 0.2× 302 2.1× 69 993
Jakob Lykke Poulsen 77 0.2× 491 1.4× 134 0.4× 57 0.2× 171 1.2× 51 902
Seiji Futagami 217 0.5× 970 2.7× 136 0.4× 173 0.7× 135 0.9× 105 1.6k
Jeffrey E. Doty 46 0.1× 498 1.4× 139 0.4× 324 1.4× 293 2.0× 33 1.1k
Dov Wengrower 75 0.2× 534 1.5× 125 0.4× 299 1.3× 59 0.4× 71 1.1k
Jan Hedenbro 74 0.2× 1.7k 4.8× 123 0.4× 444 1.9× 485 3.3× 82 2.4k
Kelly C. Cushing 82 0.2× 337 0.9× 90 0.3× 42 0.2× 154 1.0× 45 1.3k
Violeta Popov 44 0.1× 434 1.2× 76 0.2× 95 0.4× 311 2.1× 45 1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Feeney

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Feeney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Feeney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Feeney more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Feeney

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Feeney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Feeney. The network helps show where Mark Feeney may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Feeney

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Feeney. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Feeney based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Feeney. Mark Feeney is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kumar, Aditi, Charlotte M. Taylor, Keith Siau, et al.. (2024). P300 Pan-academy evaluation of endoscopy immersion training in England. Poster presentations. A234.1–A234.
2.
Pohl, Keith, Keith Siau, Mark Feeney, et al.. (2024). National census of UK endoscopy services in 2023. Frontline Gastroenterology. 16(1). 20–29.
3.
Hawkes, Neil, Mesbah Rahman, Mahmud Hasan, et al.. (2021). The Role of National Specialist Societies in Influencing Transformational Change in Low-Middle Income Countries – Reflections on the Model of Implementation for a National Endoscopy Training Programme in Bangladesh. Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology. Volume 14. 103–111. 1 indexed citations
4.
Siau, Keith, Paul Dunckley, Mark Feeney, & Gavin Johnson. (2019). PWE-112 Ercp dops assessments: evidence of validity and competency development during training. A256–A256. 1 indexed citations
5.
Siau, Keith, James Crossley, Paul Dunckley, et al.. (2019). Training and Assessment in Flexible Sigmoidoscopy: using a Novel Direct Observation of Procedural Skills (DOPS) Assessment Tool. Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases. 28(1). 33–40. 2 indexed citations
6.
Siau, Keith, Rachel Levi, Lucy Howarth, et al.. (2018). PTH-146 Validation of direct observation of procedural skills (DOPS) assessments for paediatric colonoscopy. A280.2–A280. 1 indexed citations
7.
Siau, Keith, Paul Dunckley, J. Anderson, et al.. (2017). OC-021 Changes in scoring of direct observation of procedural skills (dops) forms in endoscopy training and their impact on competence assessment. HighWire Press Open Archive. A11.1–A11. 1 indexed citations
8.
Siau, Keith, Paul Dunckley, J. Anderson, et al.. (2017). PTU-009 Competency of endoscopic non-technical skills (ents) during endoscopy training. Gut. 66. A54.2–A55. 6 indexed citations
9.
Siau, Keith, Jay Anderson, Ian Beales, et al.. (2017). PTU-013 Trends in certification for gastrointestinal endoscopy and variations between trainee specialties: results from the uk jets database. Gut. 66. A57.1–A57. 3 indexed citations
10.
Siau, Keith, Paul Dunckley, John Anderson, et al.. (2017). PTU-010 Exposure to endotherapy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding at the point of gastroscopy certification – is it sufficient?. Gut. 66. A55.1–A55. 4 indexed citations
11.
Rees, Colin, Siwan Thomas‐Gibson, Matt Rutter, et al.. (2016). UK key performance indicators and quality assurance standards for colonoscopy. Gut. 65(12). 1923–1929. 213 indexed citations
13.
Vatish, Jamie, et al.. (2013). HOW GENDER AND AGE AFFECT TOLERANCE OF COLONOSCOPY. Gut. 62(Suppl 2). A45.2–A46. 1 indexed citations
14.
Vatish, Jamie, et al.. (2013). CHARACTERISTICS AND DISTRIBUTION OF POLYPS FOUND IN BOWEL CANCER SCREENING COLONOSCOPY. Gut. 62(Suppl 2). A46.1–A46.
15.
Kankwatira, Anstead, Mark Feeney, Mark T. Hendrickse, et al.. (2012). OC-028 Developing sustainable GI endoscopy training in Malawi. Gut. 61(Suppl 2). A12.2–A12. 3 indexed citations
16.
Payne, Debbie, Scott Levison, John McLaughlin, et al.. (2009). Replication and Meta‐Analysis of 13,000 Cases Defines the Risk for Interleukin‐23 Receptor and Autophagy‐Related 16‐Like 1 Variants in Crohn’s Disease. Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 24(5). 297–302. 26 indexed citations
17.
Wright, Karen L., Mark Feeney, J J T Tate, et al.. (2005). Differential Expression of Cannabinoid Receptors in the Human Colon: Cannabinoids Promote Epithelial Wound Healing. Gastroenterology. 129(2). 437–453. 236 indexed citations
18.
Wright, Karen L., Karen Coopman, Mark Feeney, et al.. (2004). Differential regulation of prostaglandin E biosynthesis by interferon‐γ in colonic epithelial cells. British Journal of Pharmacology. 141(7). 1091–1097. 15 indexed citations
19.
Feeney, Mark, Frank R. Murphy, Andrew Clegg, et al.. (2002). A case–control study of childhood environmental risk factors for the development of inflammatory bowel disease. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 14(5). 529–534. 84 indexed citations
20.
Feeney, Mark, et al.. (1997). A case-control study of measles vaccination and inflammatory bowel disease. The Lancet. 350(9080). 764–766. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026