Alisa J. Prager
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 5%
- Genetics top 5%
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Oncology
- Co-authors
- Robert J. YoungKathryn BealDana M. BlumbergJeffrey M. LiebmannGeorge A. CioffiAntonio OmuroNina MartinezTimothy A. Chan
- Topics
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders (9 papers)Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers)Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIranUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Alisa J. Prager
28 papers receiving 653 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 366
- Genetics 260
- Ophthalmology 229
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 151
- Oncology 73
Countries citing papers authored by Alisa J. Prager
This map shows the geographic impact of Alisa J. Prager's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alisa J. Prager with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alisa J. Prager more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alisa J. Prager
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alisa J. Prager. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alisa J. Prager. The network helps show where Alisa J. Prager may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alisa J. Prager
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alisa J. Prager. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alisa J. Prager based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alisa J. Prager. Alisa J. Prager is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | Retrospective analysis of the efficacy and safety of netarsudil in clinical practice | 2 |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 32 | |
| 14 | Internal Limiting Membrane Peel is Associated with Increased Ganglion Cell Loss and Poor Visual Outcome in Patients with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma | 2 |
| 15 | 36 | |
| 16 | 147 | |
| 17 | 119 | |
| 18 | 36 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | Characterization of the response of a human breast carcinoma cell line (T-47D) to radiation and chemotherapeutic agents. | 1 |
About Alisa J. Prager
Alisa J. Prager is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Family Practice and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 30 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (9 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (6 papers) and Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (229 citations), Genetics (260 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (366 citations). Alisa J. Prager has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Iran and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. Young, Kathryn Beal, Dana M. Blumberg, Jeffrey M. Liebmann, George A. Cioffi, Antonio Omuro, Nina Martinez, Timothy A. Chan, Dustin Boothe and Yoshiya Yamada. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Cancer and American Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.