Alicia Meng

22 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers

Alicia Meng
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Health Informatics 9
  • Genetics 64
  • Emergency Medicine 36
  • Health Information Management 12
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 3
Replace Joseph M. Abbatematteo with:
Joseph M. Abbatematteo United States
Alia Qureshi United States
Naureen Mushtaq Pakistan
Lauren T. Thornton United States
Zeyu Liu China
Ryan W. England United States
Dahniel Sastow United States
Isabel Alvarez Italy
D A Collie United Kingdom
Kwok-Wan Yeung Taiwan
Alicia Meng relative to Joseph M. Abbatematteo United States Joseph M. Abbatematteo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Joseph M. Abbatematteo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Alicia Meng

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alicia Meng's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alicia Meng with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alicia Meng more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alicia Meng

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alicia Meng. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alicia Meng. The network helps show where Alicia Meng may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Alicia Meng, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Alicia Meng Line = papers co-authored together Alicia Meng links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201955
2 202227
3 202027
4 202122
5 202222
6 202021
7 202118
8 202018
9 202113
10 202312
11 202310
12 20228
13 20228
14 20215
15 20235
16 20224
17 20222
18 20232
19 20241
20
Clinician Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Effective Postoperative Handoffs.
20201

About Alicia Meng

Alicia Meng is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Genetics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Surgery, having authored 24 papers that have together received 283 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hospital Admissions and Outcomes (5 papers), Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment (3 papers), Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (9 citations), Genetics (64 citations), Emergency Medicine (36 citations), Health Information Management (12 citations) and Issues, ethics and legal aspects (3 citations). Alicia Meng has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gloria Chiang, Sara Strauß, Michael S. Avidan, Thomas Kannampallil, Joanna Abraham, Christopher R. King, Mary C. Politi, Spyros Kitsiou, Eric J. Lenze and Ana A. Baumann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, International Journal of Medical Informatics, Journal of Community Health, BMJ Quality & Safety and American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact