Alia Qureshi

523 total citations
28 papers, 294 citations indexed

About

Alia Qureshi is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Alia Qureshi has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 294 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Surgery, 12 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Alia Qureshi's work include Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (10 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (8 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (7 papers). Alia Qureshi is often cited by papers focused on Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment (10 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (8 papers) and Esophageal and GI Pathology (7 papers). Alia Qureshi collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Thailand. Alia Qureshi's co-authors include Charanjit Sandhu, Andrew Emili, Johan N.M. Heersche, Herbert P. von Schroeder, Christian Veillette, Aurora D. Pryor, Allan Okrainec, Ashley Vergis, Christopher M. Schlachta and M. Carolina Jimenez and has published in prestigious journals such as Gastroenterology, Bone and Trends in Molecular Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Alia Qureshi

22 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Alia Qureshi United States 10 117 62 59 39 38 28 294
Michael G Fadel United Kingdom 9 122 1.0× 35 0.6× 38 0.6× 65 1.7× 20 0.5× 44 265
Punam Thakkar United States 9 151 1.3× 66 1.1× 36 0.6× 61 1.6× 7 0.2× 55 336
Megan K. Baker United States 11 157 1.3× 69 1.1× 35 0.6× 125 3.2× 42 1.1× 18 386
James MacFarlane United Kingdom 12 105 0.9× 33 0.5× 44 0.7× 10 0.3× 20 0.5× 34 370
Grace J. Kim United States 10 124 1.1× 133 2.1× 96 1.6× 32 0.8× 36 0.9× 36 385
Karim Hamaoui United Kingdom 13 246 2.1× 26 0.4× 43 0.7× 11 0.3× 45 1.2× 23 355
Rona Cheifetz Canada 11 194 1.7× 68 1.1× 19 0.3× 122 3.1× 39 1.0× 26 373
Natasha Sahr United States 9 80 0.7× 42 0.7× 58 1.0× 65 1.7× 44 1.2× 17 244
Markus Trochsler Australia 12 267 2.3× 74 1.2× 17 0.3× 71 1.8× 18 0.5× 64 421
Sarah Kamel United States 9 80 0.7× 41 0.7× 26 0.4× 43 1.1× 17 0.4× 26 271

Countries citing papers authored by Alia Qureshi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Alia Qureshi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alia Qureshi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alia Qureshi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Alia Qureshi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alia Qureshi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alia Qureshi. The network helps show where Alia Qureshi may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alia Qureshi

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alia Qureshi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alia Qureshi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alia Qureshi. Alia Qureshi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Qureshi, Alia, et al.. (2025). Post-esophagectomy hiatal hernia following minimally invasive esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. Surgical Endoscopy. 39(4). 2588–2596.
2.
Chen, Siting, et al.. (2025). Recurrence After Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: High-Volume Center Surveillance Imaging Outcomes. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 33(1). 467–473.
3.
Qureshi, Alia, et al.. (2024). Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy Using Antegrade Inversion Technique in Esophageal Cancer: 10-Year Experience from a Tertiary Care Center. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. 34(12). 1119–1127. 1 indexed citations
4.
Shao, Jenny M., Juliane Bingener, Yewande Alimi, et al.. (2024). SAGES White Paper on the importance of diversity in surgical leadership: creating the fundamentals of leadership development (FLD) curriculum. Surgical Endoscopy. 38(6). 2939–2946. 3 indexed citations
5.
Shao, Jenny M., Yewande Alimi, Juliane Bingener, et al.. (2024). Fundamentals of leadership development: a randomized pilot study to evaluate implementation of a leadership curriculum for diversity, equity, and inclusion. Surgical Endoscopy. 39(1). 614–623.
7.
Qureshi, Alia, et al.. (2023). Impact of Morbid Obesity on Post-esophagectomy Leak Rate: a NSQIP Analysis. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 27(8). 1539–1544. 3 indexed citations
8.
Hunter, John G., et al.. (2023). Understanding Post-Esophagectomy Complications and Their Management: The Early Complications. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 12(24). 7622–7622. 6 indexed citations
9.
Hekman, Ryan, Benjamin C. Blum, Sylvain Lehoux, et al.. (2022). Pilot Study Showing Feasibility of Phosphoproteomic Profiling of Pathway-Level Molecular Alterations in Barrett’s Esophagus. Genes. 13(7). 1215–1215.
10.
Dort, Jonathan, et al.. (2022). SAGES Reimagining Education & Learning (REAL) project. Surgical Endoscopy. 36(3). 1699–1708. 2 indexed citations
11.
Caycedo‐Marulanda, Antonio, et al.. (2020). SAGES TAVAC safety and efficacy analysis confocal laser endomicroscopy. Surgical Endoscopy. 35(5). 2091–2103. 16 indexed citations
12.
Telem, Dana A., et al.. (2018). SAGES climate survey: results and strategic planning for our future. Surgical Endoscopy. 32(10). 4105–4110. 9 indexed citations
13.
Sandhu, Charanjit, Alia Qureshi, & Andrew Emili. (2017). Panomics for Precision Medicine. Trends in Molecular Medicine. 24(1). 85–101. 53 indexed citations
14.
Bhutta, Mahmood F., Rishi Mandavia, Irfan Syed, et al.. (2016). A survey of how and why medical students and junior doctors choose a career in ENT surgery. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 130(11). 1054–1058. 19 indexed citations
15.
Aye, Ralph W., Alia Qureshi, Candice L. Wilshire, et al.. (2015). Feasibility, safety, and short-term efficacy of the laparoscopic Nissen–Hill hybrid repair. Surgical Endoscopy. 30(2). 551–558. 5 indexed citations
16.
Stefanidis, Dimitrios, Paul N. Montero, David R. Urbach, et al.. (2014). SAGES research agenda in gastrointestinal and endoscopic surgery: updated results of a Delphi study. Surgical Endoscopy. 28(10). 2763–2771. 15 indexed citations
17.
Qureshi, Alia, Ashley Vergis, M. Carolina Jimenez, et al.. (2011). MIS training in Canada: a national survey of general surgery residents. Surgical Endoscopy. 25(9). 3057–3065. 35 indexed citations
18.
Mahar, Alyson, Alia Qureshi, C. Andrea Ottensmeyer, et al.. (2011). A descriptive analysis of gastric cancer specimen processing techniques. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 103(3). 248–256. 3 indexed citations
19.
Qureshi, Alia, C. Andrea Ottensmeyer, Alyson Mahar, et al.. (2009). Quality Indicators for Gastric Cancer Surgery: A Survey of Practicing Pathologists in Ontario. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 16(7). 1883–1889. 9 indexed citations
20.
Schroeder, Herbert P. von, et al.. (2003). Endothelin-1 promotes osteoprogenitor proliferation and differentiation in fetal rat calvarial cell cultures. Bone. 33(4). 673–684. 64 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026