Alice De Corato
About
In The Last Decade
Alice De Corato
8 papers receiving 336 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Physiology 154
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 150
- Psychiatry and Mental health 137
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 65
- Neurology 48
Countries citing papers authored by Alice De Corato
This map shows the geographic impact of Alice De Corato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alice De Corato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alice De Corato more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alice De Corato
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alice De Corato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alice De Corato. The network helps show where Alice De Corato may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alice De Corato
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alice De Corato. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alice De Corato based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alice De Corato. Alice De Corato is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 62 | |
| 2 | 43 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 162 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.