Alexandra Voinescu
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Co-authors
- Danaë Stanton FraserJie SuiKarin PetriniCostina-Ruxandra PoetarNiamh CorriganPraminda Caleb-SollyPhillip L. MorganChris Alford
- Topics
- Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers)Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers)Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsFrontiers in PsychologyJournal of Alzheimer s Disease
- Partner nations
- United KingdomRomaniaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Alexandra Voinescu
14 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Psychiatry and Mental health 79
- Rehabilitation 66
- Human-Computer Interaction 62
- Cognitive Neuroscience 43
- Social Psychology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Alexandra Voinescu
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexandra Voinescu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexandra Voinescu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexandra Voinescu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexandra Voinescu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexandra Voinescu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexandra Voinescu. The network helps show where Alexandra Voinescu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexandra Voinescu
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexandra Voinescu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexandra Voinescu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexandra Voinescu. Alexandra Voinescu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 45 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 30 | |
| 8 | 31 | |
| 9 | 65 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2 |
About Alexandra Voinescu
Alexandra Voinescu is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Human-Computer Interaction and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 252 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (5 papers), Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (3 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (62 citations), Rehabilitation (66 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (79 citations). Alexandra Voinescu has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Romania and United States. Frequent co-authors include Danaë Stanton Fraser, Jie Sui, Karin Petrini, Costina-Ruxandra Poetar, Niamh Corrigan, Praminda Caleb-Solly, Phillip L. Morgan, Chris Alford, Liviu A. Fodor and Daniel David. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Frontiers in Psychology and Journal of Alzheimer s Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.