Alexander F. Motten
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Plant Science top 2%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Insect Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Diane R. CampbellJanis AntonovicsJudy L. StoneHelen Belefant‐MillerDavid AlexanderElizabeth E. LyonsNickolas M. WaserMary V. Price
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (14 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers)Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Alexander F. Motten
15 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.1k
- Plant Science 852
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 658
- Molecular Biology 268
- Insect Science 173
Countries citing papers authored by Alexander F. Motten
This map shows the geographic impact of Alexander F. Motten's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alexander F. Motten with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alexander F. Motten more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alexander F. Motten
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alexander F. Motten. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alexander F. Motten. The network helps show where Alexander F. Motten may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alexander F. Motten
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alexander F. Motten. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alexander F. Motten based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alexander F. Motten. Alexander F. Motten is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 36 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 120 | |
| 4 | 90 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 46 | |
| 7 | 103 | |
| 8 | 256 | |
| 9 | 222 | |
| 10 | 69 | |
| 11 | 56 | |
| 12 | Pollination ecology of the spring wildflower community in the deciduous forests of Piedmont, North Carolina | 19 |
| 13 | 15 | |
| 14 | 177 | |
| 15 | 4 |
About Alexander F. Motten
Alexander F. Motten is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Plant Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.1k citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (658 citations) and Plant Science (852 citations). Alexander F. Motten has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Diane R. Campbell, Janis Antonovics, Judy L. Stone, Helen Belefant‐Miller, David Alexander, Elizabeth E. Lyons, Nickolas M. Waser, Mary V. Price and Charles A. S. Hall. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, The American Naturalist and Evolution.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.