Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Review of studies on the public–private partnerships (PPP) for infrastructure projects
This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Hope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Hope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Hope more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Hope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Hope. The network helps show where Alex Hope may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alex Hope
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alex Hope.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alex Hope based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Alex Hope. Alex Hope is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Filho, Walter Leal, Maria Alzira Pimenta Dinis, Sara Moggi, Elizabeth Price, & Alex Hope. (2023). SDGs in the European Region. Sunderland Repository (University of Sunderland).3 indexed citations
5.
Hope, Alex. (2018). Climate Change Education: Review of the existing literature and identification of research gaps. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).1 indexed citations
Hope, Alex, et al.. (2015). Climate Change and Social Media: Trust, literacy, legitimacy and subjectivity. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).1 indexed citations
8.
Hope, Alex & Robert Moehler. (2015). Responsible Business Model Innovation: Reconceptualising the role of business in society.. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).6 indexed citations
9.
Hope, Alex & Robert Moehler. (2015). Responsible Business Model Innovation: Reconceptualizing the role of business in society. 1676.2 indexed citations
Hope, Alex, et al.. (2013). Re-imagining the Iron Triangle: Embedding Sustainability into Project Constraints. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).51 indexed citations
12.
Hope, Alex, et al.. (2012). Building the future: integrating building information management and environmental assessment methodologies. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).19 indexed citations
13.
Hope, Alex. (2012). Project Management as if the World Matters: At the Intersection of Sustainable Development and Project Management. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).6 indexed citations
14.
Hope, Alex. (2012). Contextual Factors influencing Sustainability in Private Finance Initiative (PFI) Housing in the UK. The American Surgeon. 83(8). e302–304.2 indexed citations
15.
Hope, Alex & Geoff O’Brien. (2010). Environmental capacity building through knowledge transfer partnerships. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).2 indexed citations
16.
Hope, Alex. (2010). Transfer for Transition: Increasing Productivity and Competitiveness in a Low Carbon Economy. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University).1 indexed citations
Zanetti, Renato, et al.. (1985). Boosting tower performance by more than a trickle.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.