Alex Harscher
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Structural Biology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Steffen KibbelHannes LichteAlfred StettRobert WilkeHeval BenavUdo GreppmaierBarbara WilhelmDorothea Besch
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers)Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (6 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
Alex Harscher
14 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 840
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 557
- Cognitive Neuroscience 301
- Molecular Biology 211
- Structural Biology 104
Countries citing papers authored by Alex Harscher
This map shows the geographic impact of Alex Harscher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alex Harscher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alex Harscher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alex Harscher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alex Harscher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alex Harscher. The network helps show where Alex Harscher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alex Harscher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alex Harscher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alex Harscher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alex Harscher. Alex Harscher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 118 | |
| 4 | Factors Affecting Perceptual Thersholds of Subretinal Electric Stimulation in Blind Volunteers | 7 |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to wordsbreakdown → | 626 |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 73 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 35 | |
| 12 | 33 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | 7 |
About Alex Harscher
Alex Harscher is a scholar working on Structural Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Radiation, having authored 14 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers), Advanced Memory and Neural Computing (6 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (104 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (840 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (301 citations). Alex Harscher has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Hungary and Benin. Frequent co-authors include Steffen Kibbel, Hannes Lichte, Alfred Stett, Robert Wilke, Heval Benav, Udo Greppmaier, Barbara Wilhelm, Dorothea Besch, Florian Gekeler and Ákos Kusnyerik. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits and Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.