Alessandra Stella
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Social Psychology
- Language and Linguistics
- Co-authors
- Francesco Di RussoDonatella SpinelliSabrina PitzalisGrazia Fernanda SpitoniSteven A. HillyardTeresa AprileFabiana PatriaChiara Bertini
- Topics
- Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers)Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyCellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesBelgium
In The Last Decade
Alessandra Stella
5 papers receiving 405 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Cognitive Neuroscience 357
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 115
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 45
- Social Psychology 41
- Language and Linguistics 20
Countries citing papers authored by Alessandra Stella
This map shows the geographic impact of Alessandra Stella's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alessandra Stella with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alessandra Stella more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alessandra Stella
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alessandra Stella. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alessandra Stella. The network helps show where Alessandra Stella may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alessandra Stella
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alessandra Stella. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alessandra Stella based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alessandra Stella. Alessandra Stella is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 93 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Spatio-temporal characterization of metaphor comprehension | 0 |
| 6 | 258 |
About Alessandra Stella
Alessandra Stella is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 6 papers that have together received 410 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (3 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (3 papers) and Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (357 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (115 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (45 citations). Alessandra Stella has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Di Russo, Donatella Spinelli, Sabrina Pitzalis, Grazia Fernanda Spitoni, Steven A. Hillyard, Teresa Aprile, Fabiana Patria, Chiara Bertini, Walter Schaeken and Valentina Bambini. Their work appears in journals such as NeuroImage, Human Brain Mapping and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.