Aleksander B. Gundersen

410 total citations
14 papers, 250 citations indexed

About

Aleksander B. Gundersen is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Aleksander B. Gundersen has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 250 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Aleksander B. Gundersen's work include Misinformation and Its Impacts (11 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers). Aleksander B. Gundersen is often cited by papers focused on Misinformation and Its Impacts (11 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers) and Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy (3 papers). Aleksander B. Gundersen collaborates with scholars based in Norway, Poland and United Kingdom. Aleksander B. Gundersen's co-authors include Jonas R. Kunst, Kinga Bierwiaczonek, April H. Bailey, Claire Prendergast, Karolina Noworyta, Jan Piasecki, Rafał Ryguła, Mikołaj Morzy, Milan Obaidi and Sander van der Linden and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Sex Roles and Frontiers in Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Aleksander B. Gundersen

14 papers receiving 240 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Aleksander B. Gundersen Norway	7	179	84	60	45	43	14	250
Molly Ellenberg United States	10	185 1.0×	60 0.7×	27 0.5×	18 0.4×	27 0.6×	29	301
María Chayinska Italy	11	262 1.5×	21 0.3×	29 0.5×	53 1.2×	67 1.6×	27	319
Arin H. Ayanian Germany	7	157 0.9×	26 0.3×	19 0.3×	20 0.4×	23 0.5×	17	214
Dinka Čorkalo Biruški Croatia	10	233 1.3×	21 0.3×	31 0.5×	27 0.6×	15 0.3×	45	315
Lora M. Levett United States	10	133 0.7×	121 1.4×	48 0.8×	56 1.2×	4 0.1×	16	321
Beth Haney United States	4	284 1.6×	216 2.6×	80 1.3×	15 0.3×	18 0.4×	5	358
Alison Marganski United States	10	212 1.2×	157 1.9×	183 3.0×	7 0.2×	14 0.3×	17	336
Igor Mikloušić Croatia	5	86 0.5×	10 0.1×	52 0.9×	34 0.8×	10 0.2×	10	144
Benjamin Banai Croatia	7	90 0.5×	13 0.2×	41 0.7×	40 0.9×	8 0.2×	19	172
Megan Stubbs-Richardson United States	8	67 0.4×	91 1.1×	39 0.7×	7 0.2×	28 0.7×	14	262

Countries citing papers authored by Aleksander B. Gundersen

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aleksander B. Gundersen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aleksander B. Gundersen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aleksander B. Gundersen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aleksander B. Gundersen

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aleksander B. Gundersen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aleksander B. Gundersen. The network helps show where Aleksander B. Gundersen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aleksander B. Gundersen

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aleksander B. Gundersen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aleksander B. Gundersen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aleksander B. Gundersen. Aleksander B. Gundersen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

Gundersen, Aleksander B., Mikey Biddlestone, & Jonas R. Kunst. (2025). The Dual Impact of Believing and Spreading Conspiracy Theories: Independent and Interactive Effects on Social Perceptions and Orientations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 688252760–688252760. 1 indexed citations

Kunst, Jonas R., Aleksander B. Gundersen, Jan Piasecki, et al.. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence to identify the psychological factors associated with conspiracy theory beliefs online. Nature Communications. 15(1). 7497–7497. 4 indexed citations

Gundersen, Aleksander B., Sander van der Linden, Jan Piasecki, et al.. (2024). Predicting misinformation beliefs across four countries: The role of narcissism, conspiracy mentality, social trust, and perceptions of unsafe neighborhoods. Journal of Social and Political Psychology. 12(2). 265–283. 2 indexed citations

Noworyta, Karolina, Aleksander B. Gundersen, Jonas R. Kunst, et al.. (2024). The impact of confirmation bias awareness on mitigating susceptibility to misinformation. Frontiers in Public Health. 12. 1414864–1414864. 4 indexed citations

Noworyta, Karolina, Jan Piasecki, Aleksander B. Gundersen, et al.. (2024). Research Report: A Link between Sertraline Treatment and Susceptibility to (Mis)information. ACS Chemical Neuroscience. 15(7). 1515–1522. 1 indexed citations

Gundersen, Aleksander B., Sander van der Linden, Mikołaj Morzy, et al.. (2023). The role of perceived minority-group status in the conspiracy beliefs of factual majority groups. Royal Society Open Science. 10(10). 6 indexed citations

Noworyta, Karolina, Aleksander B. Gundersen, Jonas R. Kunst, et al.. (2023). Are we willing to share what we believe is true? Factors influencing susceptibility to fake news. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 14. 1165103–1165103. 5 indexed citations

Gundersen, Aleksander B., Jonas R. Kunst, Karolina Noworyta, et al.. (2023). Psychological interventions countering misinformation in social media: A scoping review. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 13. 974782–974782. 18 indexed citations

Kunst, Jonas R., et al.. (2023). How are acculturation orientations associated among majority-group members? The moderating role of ideology and levels of identity. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. 96. 101857–101857. 11 indexed citations

10.

Noworyta, Karolina, et al.. (2022). Cognitive Processes and Personality Traits Underlying Four Phenotypes of Susceptibility to (Mis)Information. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 13. 912397–912397. 9 indexed citations

11.

Bierwiaczonek, Kinga, Aleksander B. Gundersen, & Jonas R. Kunst. (2022). The role of conspiracy beliefs for COVID-19 health responses: A meta-analysis. Current Opinion in Psychology. 46. 101346–101346. 84 indexed citations

12.

Kunst, Jonas R., et al.. (2021). Psychological interventions countering misinformation in social media. A scoping review. Research protocol. Homo Politicus (Academy of Humanities and Economics in Lodz). 1 indexed citations

13.

Gundersen, Aleksander B. & Jonas R. Kunst. (2018). Feminist ≠ Feminine? Feminist Women Are Visually Masculinized Whereas Feminist Men Are Feminized. Sex Roles. 80(5-6). 291–309. 23 indexed citations

14.

Kunst, Jonas R., April H. Bailey, Claire Prendergast, & Aleksander B. Gundersen. (2018). Sexism, rape myths and feminist identification explain gender differences in attitudes toward the #metoo social media campaign in two countries. Media Psychology. 22(5). 818–843. 81 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact