Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Pauses, gaps and overlaps in conversations
2010314 citationsMattias Heldner, Jens EdlundJournal of Phoneticsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Mattias Heldner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Mattias Heldner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mattias Heldner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mattias Heldner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mattias Heldner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mattias Heldner. The network helps show where Mattias Heldner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mattias Heldner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mattias Heldner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mattias Heldner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mattias Heldner. Mattias Heldner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Heldner, Mattias, Anna Hjalmarsson, & Jens Edlund. (2013). Backchannel relevance spaces. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 137–146.17 indexed citations
6.
Edlund, Jens, et al.. (2012). 3rd party observer gaze as a continuous measure of dialogue flow. Language Resources and Evaluation. 1354–1358.2 indexed citations
Laskowski, Kornel, Mattias Heldner, & Jens Edlund. (2010). Preliminaries to an account of multi-party conversational turn-taking as an antiferromagnetic spin glass. Neural Information Processing Systems.1 indexed citations
10.
Laskowski, Kornel, Mattias Heldner, & Jens Edlund. (2009). Exploring the prosody of floor mechanisms in english using the fundamental frequency variation spectrum. European Signal Processing Conference. 2539–2543.4 indexed citations
11.
Heldner, Mattias, et al.. (2009). Prosodic features in the vicinity of pauses, gaps and overlaps. 95–106.3 indexed citations
Edlund, Jens, Mattias Heldner, & Joakim Gustafson. (2006). Two faces of spoken dialogue systems. Conference of the International Speech Communication Association.8 indexed citations
14.
Carlson, Rolf, Jens Edlund, Mattias Heldner, et al.. (2006). Towards human-like behaviour in spoken dialog systems.5 indexed citations
15.
Edlund, Jens & Mattias Heldner. (2006). vertical bar nailon vertical bar : Software for Online Analysis of Prosody. 2022–2025.2 indexed citations
Heldner, Mattias. (2001). Spectral emphasis as an additional source of information in accent detection. 57–60.31 indexed citations
19.
Heldner, Mattias, Eva Strangert, & Thierry Deschamps. (1999). Focus Detection Using Overall Intensity and High Frequency Emphasis.3 indexed citations
20.
Swerts, Marc, Eva Strangert, & Mattias Heldner. (1996). F0 declination in read-aloud and spontaneous speech. 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP 1996). 1501–1504.10 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.