Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Albert Ellis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Albert Ellis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Albert Ellis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Albert Ellis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Albert Ellis. The network helps show where Albert Ellis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Albert Ellis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Albert Ellis.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Albert Ellis based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Albert Ellis. Albert Ellis is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ellis, Albert. (2008). Do Some Religious Beliefs Help Create Emotional Disturbance. Psychotherapy in Private Practice.8 indexed citations
2.
Ellis, Albert. (2007). General Semantics and Rational-Emotive Therapy: 1991 Alfred Korzybski Memorial Lecture. ETC.: A Review of General Semantics. 64(4). 301.4 indexed citations
Ellis, Albert. (2000). A Continuation of the Dialogue on Issues in Counseling in the Postmodern Era.. Journal of Mental Health Counseling. 22(2). 97–106.5 indexed citations
7.
Ellis, Albert. (1998). La terapia sin excusas. 22–27.2 indexed citations
8.
Ellis, Albert. (1997). Postmodern Ethics for Active-Directive Counseling and Psychotherapy.. Journal of Mental Health Counseling. 19(3).13 indexed citations
9.
Ellis, Albert. (1996). A Social Constructionist Position for Mental Health Counseling: A Reply to Jeffrey T. Guterman.. Journal of Mental Health Counseling. 18(1). 16–28.6 indexed citations
10.
Klein, Jeremy, et al.. (1994). More E-prime : to be or not II.1 indexed citations
Ellis, Albert. (1989). Thoughts on Supervising Counselors and Therapists.. 26(1). 3–5.1 indexed citations
13.
Ellis, Albert. (1988). Is Religiosity Pathological. 8(2). 27–32.35 indexed citations
14.
Ellis, Albert & Michael E. Bernard. (1983). Rational-emotive approaches to the problems of childhood. Plenum Press eBooks.66 indexed citations
15.
Ellis, Albert. (1978). Critical Reaction to Personal Mastery Group Counseling.. The Journal for Specialists in Group Work. 3(3).
16.
Ellis, Albert. (1977). Skill Training in Counselling and Psychotherapy. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 12(1).5 indexed citations
17.
Ellis, Albert. (1976). The biological basis of human irrationality.. PubMed. 32(2). 145–68.89 indexed citations
18.
Ellis, Albert. (1975). Rational-Emotive Therapy and the School Counselor.. The School counselor.9 indexed citations
19.
Ellis, Albert. (1971). An Experiment in Emotional Education.. Educational Technology archive.9 indexed citations
20.
Ellis, Albert. (1963). The intelligent woman's guide to man-hunting.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.