Alan Renwick
About
In The Last Decade
Alan Renwick
106 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1.2k
- Economics and Econometrics 675
- Soil Science 433
- Global and Planetary Change 377
- Plant Science 377
Countries citing papers authored by Alan Renwick
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan Renwick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan Renwick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan Renwick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alan Renwick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan Renwick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan Renwick. The network helps show where Alan Renwick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alan Renwick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alan Renwick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alan Renwick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alan Renwick. Alan Renwick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | From Blockades to Supply Chain Integration: Challenges of Co-ordination in the Agrifood Sector | 1 |
| 6 | A European Perspective on the Economics of Big Data | 47 |
| 7 | Management strategies to conserve the grey partridge: the effect on other farmland birds. | 1 |
| 8 | Moorland management in Higher Level Stewardship: the evidence base for sustainable stocking rates. | 1 |
| 9 | Can woodland measures in agri-environment policies assist in meeting Water Framework Directive objectives? | 1 |
| 10 | Assessing the impact of Environmental Stewardship on lowland farmland birds in England. | 5 |
| 11 | Grey Partridge and agri-environment schemes: science, implementation and assessment. | 1 |
| 12 | The role of desk review in assessing the potential for biodiversity delivery by the Tir Gofal agri-environment scheme in Wales. | 2 |
| 13 | Simple and rapid biodiversity assessments (SARBAS): an evaluation method of Ireland's Agri-Environment Scheme. | 1 |
| 14 | Development and application of a profit maximising whole farm model for milk production systems. | 0 |
| 15 | Using modelling as a tool to explore resource use efficiency by crops. | 1 |
| 16 | Environmental impacts of UK pig production systems: analysis using Life Cycle Assessment. | 1 |
| 17 | Modelling agri-environment interactions and trade-offs using Farm-adapt - integration of models, investigation of scale, dynamics and uncertainty. | 3 |
| 18 | Combining systems thinking with a qualitative stakeholder process: a case study in regional land fragmentation in New Zealand. | 1 |
| 19 | Use of multivariate methods to summarise the results from an evolutionary policy optimisation model (APolo): a case study for Scottish agriculture. | 1 |
| 20 | Design, development and use of a national survey of fertiliser applications | 1 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.