Alan L. Sorkin
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Sociology and Political Science
- Endocrinology top 10%
- Health
- Co-authors
- Phyllis A. WallaceAbdollah NaficyMalla RaoDenise AntonaJohn D ClemensChristophe PaquetKent H. SummersJames K. Mitchell
- Topics
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers)Global Health Care Issues (3 papers)Indian Economic and Social Development (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Alan L. Sorkin
29 papers receiving 208 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Economics and Econometrics 73
- General Health Professions 54
- Sociology and Political Science 46
- Endocrinology 46
- Health 21
Countries citing papers authored by Alan L. Sorkin
This map shows the geographic impact of Alan L. Sorkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Alan L. Sorkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Alan L. Sorkin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Alan L. Sorkin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Alan L. Sorkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Alan L. Sorkin. The network helps show where Alan L. Sorkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Alan L. Sorkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Alan L. Sorkin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Alan L. Sorkin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Alan L. Sorkin. Alan L. Sorkin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 48 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Female labor force participation and development | 5 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | Some economic aspects of the demand for health services. | 2 |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | Economic Aspects of Natural Hazards | 19 |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | The economics of the postal system : alternatives and reform | 2 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Alan L. Sorkin
Alan L. Sorkin is a scholar working on Public Administration, Business and International Management and Endocrinology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (3 papers), Global Health Care Issues (3 papers) and Indian Economic and Social Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology (46 citations), Modeling and Simulation (18 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (73 citations). Alan L. Sorkin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Phyllis A. Wallace, Abdollah Naficy, Malla Rao, Denise Antona, John D Clemens, Christophe Paquet, Kent H. Summers, James K. Mitchell, Sar A. Levitan and Ismail Sirageldin. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Social Science & Medicine and Social Forces.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.