Akihiko Ueno
- Organic Chemistry top 0.5%
- Spectroscopy top 0.2%
- Materials Chemistry top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Pharmaceutical Science top 0.2%
- Co-authors
- Tetsuo OsaFujio TodaHiroshi IkedaIwao SuzukiHisakazu MiharaAsao NakamuraKeita HamasakiJun‐ichi Anzai
- Topics
- Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (72 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (51 papers)Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (46 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanChinaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Akihiko Ueno
255 papers receiving 5.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Organic Chemistry 2.5k
- Spectroscopy 2.5k
- Materials Chemistry 2.1k
- Molecular Biology 1.8k
- Pharmaceutical Science 791
Countries citing papers authored by Akihiko Ueno
This map shows the geographic impact of Akihiko Ueno's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Akihiko Ueno with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Akihiko Ueno more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Akihiko Ueno
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Akihiko Ueno. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Akihiko Ueno. The network helps show where Akihiko Ueno may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Akihiko Ueno
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Akihiko Ueno. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Akihiko Ueno based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Akihiko Ueno. Akihiko Ueno is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 25 | |
| 3 | Design and Peroxidase-like Activity of 3α-Helix Hemoproteins | 1 |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 39 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | Nanoparticle formation of self-assembling two-α-helix peptide induced by heme-binding | 3 |
| 14 | Design and Synthesis of Peptide Misfolding from α to β Structure and Regulation by β-Cyclodextrin as Mini-Molecular Chaperone | 1 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 76 | |
| 19 | 120 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Akihiko Ueno
Akihiko Ueno is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Pharmaceutical Science and Bioengineering, having authored 255 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Sensors and Ion Detection (72 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (51 papers) and Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (46 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Spectroscopy (2.5k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (791 citations) and Organic Chemistry (2.5k citations). Akihiko Ueno has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, China and United States. Frequent co-authors include Tetsuo Osa, Fujio Toda, Hiroshi Ikeda, Iwao Suzuki, Hisakazu Mihara, Asao Nakamura, Keita Hamasaki, Jun‐ichi Anzai, Keiko Takahashi and Tetsuo Kuwabara. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Advanced Materials.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.