Aimee Shreck

1.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 898 citations indexed

About

Aimee Shreck is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Plant Science and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. According to data from OpenAlex, Aimee Shreck has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 898 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Strategy and Management, 5 papers in Plant Science and 4 papers in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Recurrent topics in Aimee Shreck's work include Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (6 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (2 papers). Aimee Shreck is often cited by papers focused on Global trade, sustainability, and social impact (6 papers), Organic Food and Agriculture (5 papers) and Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (2 papers). Aimee Shreck collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Norway. Aimee Shreck's co-authors include Christy Getz, Michelle Grant, Johan Six, Birgit Kopainsky, Pius Kruetli, Quang Bao Le, Danielle M. Tendall, Peter Edwards, Jonas Joerin and Gail Feenstra and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Consumer Studies, Global Food Security and Agriculture and Human Values.

In The Last Decade

Aimee Shreck

8 papers receiving 846 citations

Hit Papers

Food system resilience: Defining the concept 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Aimee Shreck United States 6 441 264 249 182 166 9 898
Christy Getz United States 19 526 1.2× 380 1.4× 226 0.9× 77 0.4× 174 1.0× 27 1.1k
Mary Hendrickson United States 15 565 1.3× 335 1.3× 150 0.6× 216 1.2× 152 0.9× 60 954
K. Weinberger Taiwan 16 437 1.0× 310 1.2× 124 0.5× 181 1.0× 58 0.3× 52 1.1k
Dominique Barjolle Switzerland 16 502 1.1× 280 1.1× 200 0.8× 319 1.8× 159 1.0× 60 1.2k
Goedele Van den Broeck Belgium 17 255 0.6× 269 1.0× 128 0.5× 151 0.8× 95 0.6× 42 947
Alison Blay‐Palmer Canada 15 659 1.5× 232 0.9× 68 0.3× 306 1.7× 179 1.1× 32 1.1k
Annie Shattuck United States 16 684 1.6× 845 3.2× 230 0.9× 140 0.8× 138 0.8× 31 1.4k
Eva‐Marie Meemken United States 16 380 0.9× 434 1.6× 324 1.3× 96 0.5× 196 1.2× 24 1.1k
Jessica Duncan Netherlands 16 380 0.9× 334 1.3× 109 0.4× 190 1.0× 189 1.1× 43 804
Michelle Grant Switzerland 3 190 0.4× 130 0.5× 71 0.3× 141 0.8× 130 0.8× 4 547

Countries citing papers authored by Aimee Shreck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aimee Shreck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aimee Shreck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aimee Shreck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aimee Shreck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aimee Shreck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aimee Shreck. The network helps show where Aimee Shreck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Aimee Shreck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Aimee Shreck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Aimee Shreck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Aimee Shreck. Aimee Shreck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Shreck, Aimee. (2021). Just Bananas? Fair Trade Banana Production in the Dominican Republic. International journal of sociology of agriculture and food. 10(2). 13–23. 1 indexed citations
2.
Grant, Michelle, et al.. (2018). Tackling Food System Challenges through Experiential Education Criteria for Optimal Course Design. Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich). 27(1). 169–175. 2 indexed citations
3.
Grant, Michelle, Aimee Shreck, & Nina Buchmann. (2018). Tackling Food System Challenges through Experiential Education: Criteria for Optimal Course Design. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society. 27(1). 169–175. 4 indexed citations
4.
Tendall, Danielle M., Jonas Joerin, Birgit Kopainsky, et al.. (2015). Food system resilience: Defining the concept. Global Food Security. 6. 17–23. 535 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Getz, Christy, Sandy Brown, & Aimee Shreck. (2008). Class Politics and Agricultural Exceptionalism in California's Organic Agriculture Movement. Politics & Society. 36(4). 478–507. 44 indexed citations
6.
Shreck, Aimee, Christy Getz, & Gail Feenstra. (2006). Social sustainability, farm labor, and organic agriculture: Findings from an exploratory analysis. Agriculture and Human Values. 23(4). 439–449. 120 indexed citations
7.
Getz, Christy & Aimee Shreck. (2006). What organic and Fair Trade labels do not tell us: towards a place‐based understanding of certification. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 30(5). 490–501. 104 indexed citations
8.
Shreck, Aimee. (2005). Resistance, redistribution, and power in the Fair Trade banana initiative. Agriculture and Human Values. 22(1). 17–29. 83 indexed citations
9.
Shreck, Aimee, et al.. (2002). Just bananas? a fair trade alternative for small-scale producers in the Dominican Republic. Open MIND. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026