Aidan Lyon

18 papers receiving 401 citations

Hit Papers

Why are Normal Distributions Normal? 2013 · 138 citations
13820132026201720214080120

Peers

Aidan Lyon
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • History and Philosophy of Science 151
  • Theoretical Computer Science 13
  • General Decision Sciences 14
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 70
  • Philosophy 49
Replace Ian G. Stewart with:
Ian G. Stewart United Kingdom
Dana Mackenzie Brazil
Dale Johnson United States
Euclid
Leonhard Euler Germany
Mohan Delampady India
Howard Eves United States
Victor Katz United States
Edwin E. Moïse United States
Daniel P. Mäki United States
Aidan Lyon relative to Ian G. Stewart United Kingdom Ian G. Stewart's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Ian G. Stewart · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Aidan Lyon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Aidan Lyon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aidan Lyon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aidan Lyon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Aidan Lyon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Aidan Lyon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Aidan Lyon. The network helps show where Aidan Lyon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Aidan Lyon, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Aidan Lyon Line = papers co-authored together Aidan Lyon links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 20236
2 20222
3 20217
4 20173
5 20172
6 20162
7 20161
8 201515
9 20155
10 201311
11
Why are Normal Distributions Normal?
Hit paper breakdown →
2013138
12 20139
13
Judgement Swapping and Aggregation.
20121
14 20127
15 201149
16 201162
17 201025
18 200788

About Aidan Lyon

Aidan Lyon is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Theoretical Computer Science, History and Philosophy of Science, Family Practice and Applied Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (5 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Data-Driven Disease Surveillance (3 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (2 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (2 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (151 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (13 citations), General Decision Sciences (14 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (70 citations) and Philosophy (49 citations). Aidan Lyon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Mark Colyvan, Mark A. Burgman, Bonnie C. Wintle, Michael Morreau, Charles Twardy, Marissa F. McBride, Fiona Fidler, Steven Mascaro, Brian J. Manning and Louisa Flander. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Theory and Decision, Diversity and Distributions, Australasian Journal of Paramedicine and Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026