Ahmed Najar

573 total citations
13 papers, 469 citations indexed

About

Ahmed Najar is a scholar working on Ecology, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ahmed Najar has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 469 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Ecology, 9 papers in Insect Science and 5 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Ahmed Najar's work include Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Ahmed Najar is often cited by papers focused on Forest Insect Ecology and Management (11 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (5 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). Ahmed Najar collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Ahmed Najar's co-authors include Nadir Erbilgin, Jennifer G. Klutsch, Maya L. Evenden, Jonathan A. Cale, Caroline Whitehouse, Cary Ma, Pierluigi Bonello, Julie Godbout, Jean Bousquet and Patrick Sherwood and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, New Phytologist and Oecologia.

In The Last Decade

Ahmed Najar

13 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ahmed Najar Canada 12 360 317 135 117 70 13 469
Eric J. Rebek United States 12 309 0.9× 460 1.5× 181 1.3× 220 1.9× 71 1.0× 30 609
N. J. Fielding United Kingdom 14 271 0.8× 293 0.9× 130 1.0× 112 1.0× 49 0.7× 27 404
Andrej Kunca Slovakia 12 270 0.8× 238 0.8× 89 0.7× 93 0.8× 92 1.3× 54 422
Milan Pernek Croatia 12 271 0.8× 266 0.8× 204 1.5× 89 0.8× 40 0.6× 68 427
Glenn Fowler United States 8 255 0.7× 209 0.7× 93 0.7× 170 1.5× 51 0.7× 16 471
Martin Schebeck Austria 11 280 0.8× 284 0.9× 103 0.8× 60 0.5× 53 0.8× 29 419
Steven Katovich United States 11 267 0.7× 251 0.8× 90 0.7× 72 0.6× 131 1.9× 33 416
Masashi Ohsawa Japan 11 198 0.6× 199 0.6× 66 0.5× 67 0.6× 65 0.9× 20 319
Erkki Annila Finland 14 404 1.1× 325 1.0× 134 1.0× 97 0.8× 95 1.4× 39 550
Katherine P. Bleiker Canada 12 530 1.5× 471 1.5× 145 1.1× 78 0.7× 84 1.2× 26 585

Countries citing papers authored by Ahmed Najar

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ahmed Najar's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ahmed Najar with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ahmed Najar more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ahmed Najar

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ahmed Najar. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ahmed Najar. The network helps show where Ahmed Najar may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ahmed Najar

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ahmed Najar. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ahmed Najar based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ahmed Najar. Ahmed Najar is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Klutsch, Jennifer G., Ahmed Najar, Patrick Sherwood, Pierluigi Bonello, & Nadir Erbilgin. (2017). A Native Parasitic Plant Systemically Induces Resistance in Jack Pine to a Fungal Symbiont of Invasive Mountain Pine Beetle. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 43(5). 506–518. 7 indexed citations
2.
3.
Erbilgin, Nadir, et al.. (2017). Weathering the storm: how lodgepole pine trees survive mountain pine beetle outbreaks. Oecologia. 184(2). 469–478. 48 indexed citations
4.
Erbilgin, Nadir, Jonathan A. Cale, Inka Lusebrink, et al.. (2016). Water-deficit and fungal infection can differentially affect the production of different classes of defense compounds in two host pines of mountain pine beetle. Tree Physiology. 37(3). 338–350. 35 indexed citations
6.
Klutsch, Jennifer G., Ahmed Najar, Jonathan A. Cale, & Nadir Erbilgin. (2016). Direction of interaction between mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) and resource-sharing wood-boring beetles depends on plant parasite infection. Oecologia. 182(1). 1–12. 24 indexed citations
8.
Najar, Ahmed, et al.. (2015). Pheromone Production by an Invasive Bark Beetle Varies with Monoterpene Composition of its Naïve Host. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 41(6). 540–549. 27 indexed citations
9.
Karst, Justine, Nadir Erbilgin, Gregory J. Pec, et al.. (2015). Ectomycorrhizal fungi mediate indirect effects of a bark beetle outbreak on secondary chemistry and establishment of pine seedlings. New Phytologist. 208(3). 904–914. 45 indexed citations
10.
Cale, Jonathan A., Ahmed Najar, Jennifer G. Klutsch, et al.. (2015). Mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) can produce its aggregation pheromone and complete brood development in naïve red pine (Pinus resinosa) under laboratory conditions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 45(12). 1873–1877. 17 indexed citations
12.
Najar, Ahmed, Simon M. Landhäusser, Justin G. A. Whitehill, Pierluigi Bonello, & Nadir Erbilgin. (2013). Reserves Accumulated in Non-Photosynthetic Organs during the Previous Growing Season Drive Plant Defenses and Growth in Aspen in the Subsequent Growing Season. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 40(1). 21–30. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026