Heather Deans

575 total citations
21 papers, 432 citations indexed

About

Heather Deans is a scholar working on Oncology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather Deans has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 432 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Oncology, 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 4 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Heather Deans's work include Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), AI in cancer detection (4 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (4 papers). Heather Deans is often cited by papers focused on Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (8 papers), AI in cancer detection (4 papers) and Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (4 papers). Heather Deans collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Netherlands. Heather Deans's co-authors include Manpal Singh Bhogal, Fiona J. Gilbert, Gillian Needham, Karen A. Duncan, C. Cordiner, F. W. Smith, Joanne Crawford, J. A. O. Besson, N. A. G. Mowat and H. W. Sutherland and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Hepatology, Journal of Medical Genetics and Breast Cancer Research.

In The Last Decade

Heather Deans

20 papers receiving 413 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heather Deans United Kingdom 12 130 82 73 71 50 21 432
Soudabeh Fazeli Dehkordy United States 15 113 0.9× 92 1.1× 31 0.4× 112 1.6× 32 0.6× 35 601
Tamas S. Gal United States 12 77 0.6× 67 0.8× 48 0.7× 29 0.4× 43 0.9× 23 540
Jessica L. Conway Canada 10 80 0.6× 105 1.3× 39 0.5× 204 2.9× 50 1.0× 30 494
Sahir Bhatnagar Canada 12 83 0.6× 66 0.8× 25 0.3× 61 0.9× 11 0.2× 52 434
Teresa Smith United States 9 153 1.2× 47 0.6× 39 0.5× 18 0.3× 20 0.4× 16 735
Jason A. Freed United States 11 57 0.4× 98 1.2× 32 0.4× 33 0.5× 20 0.4× 39 446
Huub Straatman Netherlands 10 161 1.2× 161 2.0× 54 0.7× 20 0.3× 10 0.2× 15 565
Susan Scarvalone United States 6 156 1.2× 54 0.7× 19 0.3× 41 0.6× 23 0.5× 7 401
Stacey Fisher Canada 12 81 0.6× 25 0.3× 16 0.2× 37 0.5× 11 0.2× 25 469

Countries citing papers authored by Heather Deans

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Deans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Deans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Deans more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Deans

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Deans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Deans. The network helps show where Heather Deans may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather Deans

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather Deans. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather Deans based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather Deans. Heather Deans is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Deans, Heather & Manpal Singh Bhogal. (2017). Perpetrating Cyber Dating Abuse: A Brief Report on the Role of Aggression, Romantic Jealousy and Gender. Current Psychology. 38(5). 1077–1082. 65 indexed citations
2.
Smyth, Elizabeth, et al.. (2012). An audit of Interval Cancers detected through the Symptomatic Breast Service in a single institution. European Journal of Surgical Oncology. 38(5). 431–432. 1 indexed citations
3.
Harry, Vanessa N., Heather Deans, Emma Ramage, David E. Parkin, & Fiona J. Gilbert. (2009). Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Gynecological Oncology. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer. 19(2). 186–193. 19 indexed citations
4.
Duffy, Stephen W., Irıs D. Nagtegaal, Susan Astley, et al.. (2008). Visually assessed breast density, breast cancer risk and the importance of the craniocaudal view. Breast Cancer Research. 10(4). R64–R64. 37 indexed citations
5.
Gilbert, Fiona J., Susan Astley, Caroline Boggis, et al.. (2008). Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions. Breast Cancer Research. 10(4). R72–R72. 7 indexed citations
6.
Gilbert, Fiona J., Heather Deans, Karen A. Duncan, et al.. (2004). Design of a retrospective study of computer-aided detection in mammographic screening: Computer Aided Detection Evaluation Trial. Breast Cancer Research. 6(S1).
7.
Deans, Heather, et al.. (2002). Magnetic Resonance Imaging Appearances of the Uterus Following Microwave Endometrial Ablation. Clinical Radiology. 57(10). 926–929. 5 indexed citations
8.
Duncan, Karen A., Gillian Needham, Fiona J. Gilbert, & Heather Deans. (1998). Incident round cancers: What lessons can we learn?. Clinical Radiology. 53(1). 29–32. 36 indexed citations
9.
Gilbert, Fiona J., et al.. (1998). Routine receiver operating characteristic analysis in mammography as a measure of radiologists' performance.. British Journal of Radiology. 71(850). 1012–1017. 10 indexed citations
10.
Heys, Steven D., A K Ah-See, Gillian Needham, et al.. (1998). Accuracy of one-stop diagnosis for 1110 patients presenting to a symptomatic breast clinic. 85(5). 688–688. 12 indexed citations
11.
Deans, Heather, et al.. (1998). Scottish experience of double reading in the National Breast Screening Programme. The Breast. 7(2). 75–79. 19 indexed citations
12.
Deans, Heather, et al.. (1996). CT findings in necrotising fasciitis — A report of four cases. Clinical Radiology. 51(6). 429–432. 29 indexed citations
13.
Gilbert, Fiona J., C. Cordiner, Heather Deans, et al.. (1995). How Anxiogenic is Recall Following Breast Screening and Does a Family History of Breast Cancer Make a Difference. 4(2). 88–88. 6 indexed citations
14.
Walker, Lyndon, C. Cordiner, Fiona J. Gilbert, et al.. (1994). How distressing is attendance for routine breast screening?. Psycho-Oncology. 3(4). 299–304. 42 indexed citations
15.
Deans, Heather, et al.. (1993). Free intra-peritoneal gall-stones following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Clinical Radiology. 48(4). 258–259. 11 indexed citations
16.
Moore, John W., A. A. DUNK, Joanne Crawford, et al.. (1989). Neuropsychological deficits and morphological MRI brain scan abnormalities in apparently healthy non-encephalopathic patients with cirrhosis. Journal of Hepatology. 9(3). 319–325. 57 indexed citations
17.
Deans, Heather, et al.. (1989). Fetal fat measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. British Journal of Radiology. 62(739). 603–607. 28 indexed citations
18.
Rawluk, Daniel, et al.. (1988). Technetium 99m HMPAO scanning in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage: a preliminary study. British Journal of Radiology. 61(721). 26–29. 17 indexed citations
19.
Deans, Heather, et al.. (1988). Magnetic resonance imaging of the orbits using a binocular surface coil. British Journal of Radiology. 61(728). 665–672. 6 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Francis W., et al.. (1988). Magnetic resonance imaging of the parotid glands using inversion–recovery sequences at 0.08 T. British Journal of Radiology. 61(726). 480–491. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026