Adrian Zuckerman
- Law top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Sociology and Political Science
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Ross CranstonPaul RobertsPeter Gottwald
- Topics
- Criminal Law and Evidence (9 papers)Legal principles and applications (7 papers)European and International Contract Law (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Adrian Zuckerman
19 papers receiving 119 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Law 115
- Political Science and International Relations 60
- Economics and Econometrics 37
- Sociology and Political Science 30
- Strategy and Management 27
Countries citing papers authored by Adrian Zuckerman
This map shows the geographic impact of Adrian Zuckerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adrian Zuckerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adrian Zuckerman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adrian Zuckerman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adrian Zuckerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adrian Zuckerman. The network helps show where Adrian Zuckerman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adrian Zuckerman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adrian Zuckerman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adrian Zuckerman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adrian Zuckerman. Adrian Zuckerman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | Zuckerman on Australian Civil Procedure | 0 |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | Without Prejudice Interpretation – With Prejudice Negotiations | 2 |
| 6 | Zuckerman on Civil Procedure: Principles of Practice | 21 |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Litigation in England and Germany : legal professional services, key features and funding | 2 |
| 9 | The Challenge of Civil Justice Reform: Effective Court Management of Litigation | 3 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | Reform of civil procedure : essays on "Access to justice" | 13 |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | The principles of criminal evidence | 29 |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Adrian Zuckerman
Adrian Zuckerman is a scholar working on Law, Political Science and International Relations and Pharmacy, having authored 24 papers that have together received 162 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Law and Evidence (9 papers), Legal principles and applications (7 papers) and European and International Contract Law (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (115 citations), Political Science and International Relations (60 citations) and Pharmacy (10 citations). Adrian Zuckerman has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Ross Cranston, Paul Roberts and Peter Gottwald. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Law and Society, Modern Law Review and Oxford Journal of Legal Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.