Adrian S. Chesh

401 total citations
9 papers, 310 citations indexed

About

Adrian S. Chesh is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Adrian S. Chesh has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 310 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Ecology, 7 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 2 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Adrian S. Chesh's work include Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (9 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). Adrian S. Chesh is often cited by papers focused on Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (9 papers), Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). Adrian S. Chesh collaborates with scholars based in United States, Chile and Spain. Adrian S. Chesh's co-authors include Luis A. Ebensperger, Loren D. Hayes, Joseph R. Burger, Rodrigo A. Castro, Verónica Quirici, Joydeep Bhattacharjee, Eduardo Miranda, Arturo Cortés, Brian Keane and Nancy G. Solomon and has published in prestigious journals such as Animal Behaviour, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology and Journal of Mammalogy.

In The Last Decade

Adrian S. Chesh

9 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Adrian S. Chesh United States	8	211	189	100	32	30	9	310
Rodrigo A. Castro Chile	11	259 1.2×	234 1.2×	134 1.3×	46 1.4×	25 0.8×	14	427
Joachim Künkele Germany	13	272 1.3×	161 0.9×	160 1.6×	33 1.0×	18 0.6×	15	508
Cecilia León Chile	11	171 0.8×	217 1.1×	166 1.7×	12 0.4×	48 1.6×	22	367
Ivana Schoepf South Africa	12	301 1.4×	374 2.0×	177 1.8×	31 1.0×	48 1.6×	22	573
Carolyn J. McColl Canada	7	287 1.4×	256 1.4×	88 0.9×	48 1.5×	9 0.3×	9	426
Samantha J. Gray United Kingdom	11	189 0.9×	178 0.9×	118 1.2×	54 1.7×	15 0.5×	15	406
Polley Ann McClure United States	13	416 2.0×	299 1.6×	168 1.7×	58 1.8×	43 1.4×	25	657
Anita I. Stone United States	12	82 0.4×	195 1.0×	292 2.9×	19 0.6×	37 1.2×	24	376
Kevin B. Potts United States	12	193 0.9×	211 1.1×	483 4.8×	43 1.3×	41 1.4×	15	593
Petra Löttker Germany	11	138 0.7×	209 1.1×	235 2.4×	12 0.4×	35 1.2×	12	357

Countries citing papers authored by Adrian S. Chesh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Adrian S. Chesh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adrian S. Chesh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adrian S. Chesh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Adrian S. Chesh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adrian S. Chesh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adrian S. Chesh. The network helps show where Adrian S. Chesh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adrian S. Chesh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adrian S. Chesh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adrian S. Chesh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adrian S. Chesh. Adrian S. Chesh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Chesh, Adrian S., et al.. (2012). Are body mass and parasite load related to social partnerships and mating inMicrotus ochrogaster?. Journal of Mammalogy. 93(1). 229–238. 10 indexed citations

Ebensperger, Luis A., Adrian S. Chesh, Rodrigo A. Castro, et al.. (2011). Burrow limitations and group living in the communally rearing rodent,Octodon degus. Journal of Mammalogy. 92(1). 21–30. 31 indexed citations

Burger, Joseph R., et al.. (2011). Sociality, exotic ectoparasites, and fitness in the plural breeding rodent Octodon degus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 66(1). 57–66. 14 indexed citations

Mabry, Karen E., et al.. (2011). Comparison of Morphological Versus Molecular Characters for Discriminating Between Sympatric Meadow and Prairie Voles. The American Midland Naturalist. 165(2). 412–420. 5 indexed citations

Quirici, Verónica, Rodrigo A. Castro, Adrian S. Chesh, et al.. (2010). Seasonal variation in the range areas of the diurnal rodentOctodon degus. Journal of Mammalogy. 91(2). 458–466. 40 indexed citations

Ebensperger, Luis A., Adrian S. Chesh, Rodrigo A. Castro, et al.. (2009). Instability Rules Social Groups in the Communal Breeder RodentOctodon degus. Ethology. 115(6). 540–554. 49 indexed citations

Hayes, Loren D., Adrian S. Chesh, Rodrigo A. Castro, et al.. (2009). Fitness consequences of group living in the degu Octodon degus, a plural breeder rodent with communal care. Animal Behaviour. 78(1). 131–139. 77 indexed citations

Burger, Joseph R., Adrian S. Chesh, Rodrigo A. Castro, et al.. (2009). The influence of trap type on evaluating population structure of the semifossorial and social rodent Octodon degus. ACTA THERIOLOGICA. 54(4). 311–320. 21 indexed citations

Hayes, Loren D., Adrian S. Chesh, & Luis A. Ebensperger. (2007). Ecological Predictors of Range Areas and Use of Burrow Systems in the Diurnal Rodent, Octodon degus. Ethology. 113(2). 155–165. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact