Adam Sandford
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Education
- Co-authors
- A. Mike BurtonMarkus BindemannAhmed M. MegreyaKay L. RitchieJessica KongRobin S. S. KramerMila MilevaBenjamin Balas
- Topics
- Face Recognition and Perception (12 papers)Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (9 papers)Face recognition and analysis (8 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaCognitionMemory & Cognition
- Partner nations
- United KingdomEgyptAustralia
In The Last Decade
Adam Sandford
13 papers receiving 364 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Cognitive Neuroscience 308
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 216
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 186
- Social Psychology 48
- Education 23
Countries citing papers authored by Adam Sandford
This map shows the geographic impact of Adam Sandford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Adam Sandford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Adam Sandford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Adam Sandford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Adam Sandford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Adam Sandford. The network helps show where Adam Sandford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Adam Sandford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Adam Sandford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Adam Sandford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Adam Sandford. Adam Sandford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 41 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 83 | |
| 11 | 34 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 79 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 71 |
About Adam Sandford
Adam Sandford is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 15 papers that have together received 381 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (12 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (9 papers) and Face recognition and analysis (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (308 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (186 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (216 citations). Adam Sandford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Egypt and Australia. Frequent co-authors include A. Mike Burton, Markus Bindemann, Ahmed M. Megreya, Kay L. Ritchie, Jessica Kong, Robin S. S. Kramer, Mila Mileva, Benjamin Balas, Vicki Chen and David White. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Cognition and Memory & Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.