A.C. Matos

450 citations
37 papers · 215 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology 10
    • Viral Infections and Vectors 5
    • Mycobacterium research and diagnosis 12
    • Fungal Infections and Studies 3

A.C. Matos

31 papers receiving 211 citations

Peers

A.C. Matos
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Infectious Diseases 78
  • Parasitology 23
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 23
  • Small Animals 24
  • Epidemiology 99
Replace Emma Goeman with:
Emma Goeman Australia
Carolyne Bennett United States
Ernane F. Nascimento Brazil
Patrick W. Hickey United States
Nuria Sánchez Clemente United Kingdom
Hugo Rázuri Peru
Dongmei Wang China
Kathryn H. Lofy United States
Herman Mendez United States
Ana Cristina Cisne Frota Brazil
A.C. Matos relative to Emma Goeman Australia Emma Goeman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.6×
Emma Goeman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A.C. Matos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.C. Matos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.C. Matos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.C. Matos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.C. Matos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.C. Matos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.C. Matos. The network helps show where A.C. Matos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A.C. Matos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A.C. Matos Line = papers co-authored together A.C. Matos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201429
2
Cesarean sections in Brazil: will they ever stop increasing?
201527
3 201323
4 201322
5 201416
6 202313
7 20139
8 20148
9 20197
10 20137
11 20167
12 20187
13 20176
14 20135
15 20244
16 20253
17 20233
18 20233
19 20133
20 20242

About A.C. Matos

A.C. Matos is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Parasitology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Small Animals, having authored 37 papers that have together received 215 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mycobacterium research and diagnosis (12 papers), Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology (10 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (6 papers), Viral Infections and Vectors (5 papers), Fungal Infections and Studies (3 papers), Vector-Borne Animal Diseases (3 papers), Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare (3 papers) and Research on Leishmaniasis Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Infectious Diseases (78 citations), Parasitology (23 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (23 citations), Small Animals (24 citations) and Epidemiology (99 citations). A.C. Matos has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ana Cláudia Coelho, Manuela Matos, Maria de Lurdes Pinto, Maria Helena Martins, César G. Victora, Fernando C. Barros, Ana Goretti Kalume Maranhão, Alícia Matijasevich, Juan José Cortez-Escalante and Luı́s Cardoso. Their work appears in journals such as Pathogens, Journal of Comparative Pathology, Cancer Letters, Revista de Saúde Pública and Veterinary Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact