Abram Calderon
About
In The Last Decade
Abram Calderon
10 papers receiving 368 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Molecular Biology 174
- Cell Biology 114
- Oncology 103
- Epidemiology 65
- Organic Chemistry 52
Countries citing papers authored by Abram Calderon
This map shows the geographic impact of Abram Calderon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abram Calderon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abram Calderon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Abram Calderon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abram Calderon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abram Calderon. The network helps show where Abram Calderon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Abram Calderon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Abram Calderon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Abram Calderon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Abram Calderon. Abram Calderon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 74 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 74 | |
| 6 | 39 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 53 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.