Abhaya Nayak

952 citations
52 papers · 421 indexed · h-index 10

Abhaya Nayak

49 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers

Abhaya Nayak
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Artificial Intelligence 335
  • General Psychology 8
  • History and Philosophy of Science 26
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 79
  • Philosophy 30
Replace Anil Kumar Gupta with:
Anil Kumar Gupta India
Petros Stefaneas Greece
Laura Kallmeyer Germany
Leora Morgenstern United States
Pasi Tapanainen Finland
David Dubin United States
Corin Gurr United Kingdom
Stefan Thater Germany
Jakub Zavrel Netherlands
Tsuneaki Kato Japan
Abhaya Nayak relative to Anil Kumar Gupta India Anil Kumar Gupta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.9×
Anil Kumar Gupta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Abhaya Nayak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Abhaya Nayak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Abhaya Nayak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Abhaya Nayak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Abhaya Nayak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Abhaya Nayak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Abhaya Nayak. The network helps show where Abhaya Nayak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Abhaya Nayak, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Abhaya Nayak Line = papers co-authored together Abhaya Nayak links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20196
2 201911
3 20192
4
Probabilistic belief contraction using argumentation
20151
5
Iterated belief contraction from first principles
20079
6
DASMAS: dialogue based automation of semantic interoperability in multi agent systems
20057
7
Conservative belief revision
20041
8
Conservative belief change
20041
9
Coherence of laws
20031
10 200372
11 20022
12
Preferential Semantics for Causal Systems
19995
13
Diagrammatic Proofs
19993
14
Coherence Measure based on Average Use of Formulas
19981
15 19971
16
Learning From Conditionals: Judy Benjamin's Other Problems.
19965
17
Changing conditional beliefs unconditionally
199617
18 199610
19 199425
20
Studies in belief change
19935

About Abhaya Nayak

Abhaya Nayak is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, History and Philosophy of Science and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 52 papers that have together received 421 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (31 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (15 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (13 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (12 papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (7 papers), Advanced Algebra and Logic (6 papers), Topic Modeling (5 papers) and Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (335 citations), General Psychology (8 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (26 citations). Abhaya Nayak has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Maurice Pagnucco, Pavlos Peppas, Alok K. Sharma, Norman Foo, Mehmet A. Orgun, Mark Dras, Geoff James, Alok Sharma, Abdul Sattar and Paul E. Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, Artificial Intelligence and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026