A. Voros

3.5k citations
34 papers · 2.4k · h-index 21

Impact in

Papers in

A. Voros

33 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

A. Voros
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 1.5k
  • Mathematical Physics 429
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 503
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.1k
  • Geometry and Topology 242
Replace Arno Böhm with:
Arno Böhm United States
D. Bessis France
A. S. Wightman United States
R. F. Streater United Kingdom
M. L. Mehta France
Robert Schrader Germany
E. Bogomolny France
S. N. M. Ruijsenaars Netherlands
Daniel Kastler France
A. O. Barut United States
A. Voros relative to Arno Böhm United States Arno Böhm's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Arno Böhm · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Voros

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Voros's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Voros with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Voros more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Voros

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Voros. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Voros. The network helps show where A. Voros may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside A. Voros, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Voros Line = papers co-authored together A. Voros links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979322
2 1986275
3 1987236
4
The return of the quartic oscillator. The complex WKB method
1983167
5 1979162
6 1989149
7 1988126
8 1990119
9 1989106
10 198077
11 199871
12 199067
13 197860
14 197858
15 199542
16 199441
17 199438
18 198737
19 199730
20 197824

About A. Voros

A. Voros is a scholar working on Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mathematical Physics, Spectroscopy and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (22 papers), Molecular spectroscopy and chirality (7 papers), Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics (6 papers), Scientific Research and Discoveries (5 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (4 papers), advanced mathematical theories (4 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (4 papers) and Spectral Theory in Mathematical Physics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.5k citations), Mathematical Physics (429 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (503 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.1k citations) and Geometry and Topology (242 citations). A. Voros has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include N. L. Balázs, B. Grammaticos, M. Tabor, Michael Berry, P. Lebœuf, Marcos Saraceno, R. Balian, Giorgio Parisi, Jean-Michel Tualle and École d'été de physique théorique. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Physics, Physical Review Letters, Journal of Statistical Physics, Nuclear Physics B and Journal of Functional Analysis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact