This map shows the geographic impact of A. T. Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. T. Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. T. Jones more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. T. Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. T. Jones. The network helps show where A. T. Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. T. Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. T. Jones.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. T. Jones based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. T. Jones. A. T. Jones is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lott, William B., et al.. (2011). Defective interfering viral particles in acute dengue infections. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).2 indexed citations
Reddy, Anireddy S. N., et al.. (2002). A new graft inoculation method for screening for resistance to pigeonpea sterility mosaic virus.. 9. 44–46.5 indexed citations
Kumar, P. Lava, A. T. Jones, P. Sreenivasulu, & D. V. R. Reddy. (2000). Breakthrough in the Identification of the Causal Virus of Pigeonpea Sterility Mosaic Disease. Open Access Repository of ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics). 30(2).16 indexed citations
6.
Adams, M. J., J. F. Antoniw, H. Barker, et al.. (1998). Descriptions of plant viruses on CD-ROM. Rothamsted Repository (Rothamsted Repository).9 indexed citations
7.
Kumar, P. Lava, A. T. Jones, Brian Fenton, P. Sreenivasulu, & D. V. R. Reddy. (1998). Isolation of a Virus Associated with Sterility Mosaic Disease of Pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L) Millsp). Indian journal of plant protection. 26(2). 164–166.1 indexed citations
Brown, Derek, et al.. (1994). AN APPRAISAL OF SOME ASPECTS OF THE ECOLOGY OF NEMATODE VECTORS OF PlANT VIRUSES. Nematologia mediterranea. 22(2). 253–263.9 indexed citations
Brown, Derek, Aparecida Donisete de Faria, F. Lamberti, et al.. (1992). A DESCRIPTION OF XIPHINEMA MADEIRENSE SP. N. AND THE OCCURRENCE AND VIRUS VECTOR POTENTIAL OF X. DIVERSICAUDATUM (NEMATODA: DORYLAIMIDA) FROM SANTAN, MADEIRA. Nematologia mediterranea. 20(2). 251–259.4 indexed citations
Brown, Derek, B. Boag, A. T. Jones, & Pauline B. Topham. (1990). An assessment of the soil-sampling density and spatial distribution required to detect viruliferous nematodes (Nematoda: Longidoridae and Trichodoridae) in fields.. Nematologia mediterranea. 18(2). 153–160.3 indexed citations
15.
Jones, A. T.. (1986). Advances in the study, detection and control of viruses and virus diseases of Rubus, with particular reference to the United Kingdom.. Crop Research. 26(2). 127–171.18 indexed citations
Rolston, L. H., et al.. (1979). Field evaluation of breeding lines and cultivars of sweetpotato for resistance to the sweetpotato weevil [Cylas formicarius].. HortScience.6 indexed citations
19.
Jones, A. T. & G. A. Wood. (1978). The occurrence of cherry leaf roll virus in red raspberry in New Zealand.. The Plant disease reporter. 62(9). 835–838.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.