Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Quantitative Measurement of DNA Hybridization from Renaturation Rates
19702.5k citationsJ. De Ley, A. Reynaerts et al.European Journal of Biochemistryprofile →
Transgenic plants protected from insect attack
1987541 citationsMark Vaeck, A. Reynaerts et al.Natureprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Reynaerts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Reynaerts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Reynaerts more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Reynaerts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Reynaerts. The network helps show where A. Reynaerts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Reynaerts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Reynaerts.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Reynaerts based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with A. Reynaerts. A. Reynaerts is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Noteborn, H.P.J.M., Monique Bienenmann-Ploum, G.M. Alink, et al.. (1996). Safety assessment of the Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal protein cryia (b) expressed in transgenic tomatoes Proc. of the International Conference "Agri-Food Quality", Norwich, June 25-29,1995. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
Noteborn, H.P.J.M., Monique Bienenmann-Ploum, J.H.J. van den Berg, et al.. (1995). Safety assessment of the Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal crystal protein CRYIA(b) expressed in transgenic tomatoes. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.15 indexed citations
Peferoen, M., Stefan Jansens, A. Reynaerts, & J. Leemans. (1990). Potato plants with engineered resistance against insect attack.. 193–204.19 indexed citations
11.
Leemans, J., A. Reynaerts, Herman Höfte, et al.. (1990). Insecticidal crystal proteins from Bacillus thuringiensis and their use in transgenic crops.. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 112. 573–581.7 indexed citations
Vaeck, Mark, Herman Höfte, A. Reynaerts, et al.. (1987). Engineering of insect resistant plants using a B. thuringiensis gene. Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University). 48. 355–366.3 indexed citations
14.
Vaeck, Mark, A. Reynaerts, Herman Höfte, et al.. (1987). Transgenic plants protected from insect attack. Nature. 328(6125). 33–37.541 indexed citations breakdown →
Oosterlinck, A., A. Reynaerts, & Herman Van den Berghe. (1976). Evaluation of different profile description and decomposition methods for banded chromosomes. 334–338.8 indexed citations
19.
Ley, J. De, et al.. (1970). The Quantitative Measurement of DNA Hybridization from Renaturation Rates. European Journal of Biochemistry. 12(1). 133–142.2485 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.