A. R. Gardner‐Medwin
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Neurology top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- T.V.P. BlissCharles NicholsonJ. M. PhillipsG. S. BrindleyM. TsacopoulosJonathan A. ColesS. R. WilliamsNick van Bruggen
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers)Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
A. R. Gardner‐Medwin
33 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 136
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.7k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.1k
- Molecular Biology 759
- Neurology 295
- Psychiatry and Mental health 144
Countries citing papers authored by A. R. Gardner‐Medwin
This map shows the geographic impact of A. R. Gardner‐Medwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. R. Gardner‐Medwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. R. Gardner‐Medwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. R. Gardner‐Medwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. R. Gardner‐Medwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. R. Gardner‐Medwin. The network helps show where A. R. Gardner‐Medwin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. R. Gardner‐Medwin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. R. Gardner‐Medwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. R. Gardner‐Medwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. R. Gardner‐Medwin. A. R. Gardner‐Medwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 48 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 69 | |
| 7 | 36 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 228 | |
| 13 | 110 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | 110 | |
| 16 | 126 | |
| 17 | 95 | |
| 18 | Long‐lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in the dentate area of the unanaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant pathbreakdown → | 971 |
| 19 | Long-lasting increases of synaptic influence in the unanesthetized hippocampus. | 30 |
| 20 | 19 |
About A. R. Gardner‐Medwin
A. R. Gardner‐Medwin is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 34 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (9 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.7k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.1k citations) and Neurology (295 citations). A. R. Gardner‐Medwin has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include T.V.P. Bliss, Charles Nicholson, J. M. Phillips, G. S. Brindley, M. Tsacopoulos, Jonathan A. Coles, S. R. Williams, Nick van Bruggen, L C Fritz and N. A. Curtin. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, The Journal of Physiology and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.